Most overrated bands ever?

[Mirrorball95]

Originally Posted by toretorden

I am open to opinions, but your post was basically an essay and judging from the first bit, spending time reading the last bit didn't seem like it was going to be worth the effort.

Is it not better to hear more detailed opinions though rather than just one word definitions such as 'great' or 'the best'. To me that is boring and how are people going to reply to that? 'Sh1t' or 'the worst'.
You also contradict yourself by saying 'I am open to your opinions' but then state that 'spending time reading the last bit didn't seem like it was going to be worth the effort'.
This only proves that you are not.

[Zarko]

Originally Posted by Mirrorball95

Is it not better to hear more detailed opinions though rather than just one word definitions such as 'great' or 'the best'. To me that is boring and how are people going to reply to that? 'Sh1t' or 'the worst'.
You also contradict yourself by saying 'I am open to your opinions' but then state that 'spending time reading the last bit didn't seem like it was going to be worth the effort'.
This only proves that you are not.

Maybe if you laid it out a bit better instead of offering a wall of text?

Paragraphs are your friend...

[Mirrorball95]

Originally Posted by Zarko

Maybe if you laid it out a bit better instead of offering a wall of text?

Paragraphs are your friend...

I just type what Im thinking, you never know it may improve your reading skills.
What? (Highlighted In Bold)

[Guybrush]

Originally Posted by Mirrorball95

Is it not better to hear more detailed opinions though rather than just one word definitions such as 'great' or 'the best'. To me that is boring and how are people going to reply to that? 'Sh1t' or 'the worst'.
You also contradict yourself by saying 'I am open to your opinions' but then state that 'spending time reading the last bit didn't seem like it was going to be worth the effort'.
This only proves that you are not.

Okay, I'm not open to every opinion out there. I'm open to opinions if I think they are based on something proper. What I read from you seemed mostly based on misconceptions and some kind of personal ill-feeling and I didn't really value them. Perhaps the rest of your essay is better founded, but if I think there are higher quality opinions around to read, I'm more inclined to spend time on them than working my way through your wall of text.

You should take Zarko's advice by the way.

[coryallen2]

Originally Posted by Mirrorball95

Is it not better to hear more detailed opinions though rather than just one word definitions such as 'great' or 'the best'. To me that is boring and how are people going to reply to that? 'Sh1t' or 'the worst'.
You also contradict yourself by saying 'I am open to your opinions' but then state that 'spending time reading the last bit didn't seem like it was going to be worth the effort'.
This only proves that you are not.

[Thrice]

Originally Posted by Mirrorball95

It wasnt meant as a personal insult.
I really do hope people arent this sensitive on here.
He made a conclusion that I judged Bono because of his wealth which to me is ridiculous.
As for me being 'predisposed' to insulting people a bit of an overexaggeration there me thinks...

They are, especially in this thread. Things tend to get heated quickly and the mods like to put out any flames before the fire. Its a great concept other than the non-mod thread nazis.

EDIT: And tore is actually the person on this thread who I feel is the most open to peoples opinions.

[Mirrorball95]

Originally Posted by coryallen2

What are you confused about?

Originally Posted by toretorden

Okay, I'm not open to every opinion out there. I'm open to opinions if I think they are based on something proper. What I read from you seemed mostly based on misconceptions and some kind of personal ill-feeling and I didn't really value them. Perhaps the rest of your essay is better founded, but if I think there are higher quality opinions around to read, I'm more inclined to spend time on them than working my way through your wall of text.

You should take Zarko's advice by the way.

Firstly you only see it as 'misconceptions' because you dont agree with it. For instance it wouldnt be a 'misconception' if I actually liked the album.
My opinions is based on my perception of the music. How is that not 'something proper'.
I dont really care, I aint going to stop writing so many 'paragraphs' just because you said so or that somebody else does it..
After all 'paragraphs are my friends' after all arent they??

[coryallen2]

Nothing nevermind.

[Zarko]

Originally Posted by Mirrorball95

I just type what Im thinking, you never know it may improve your reading skills.
What? (Highlighted In Bold)

It has got nothing to do with actually understanding what you are writing, it has to do with the readability of your posts. If something is a mess, people are less inclined to read it.

Is it that hard to press 'enter' twice instead of once, once in a while?

[Zarko]

Originally Posted by Mirrorball95

What are you confused about?


Firstly you only see it as 'misconceptions' because you dont agree with it. For instance it wouldnt be a 'misconception' if I actually liked the album.
My opinions is based on my perception of the music. How is that not 'something proper'.
I dont really care, I aint going to stop writing so many 'paragraphs' just because you said so or that somebody else does it..
After all 'paragraphs are my friends' after all arent they??

Based on your U2 area of discussion, your opinion of him seems based on his life outside of music (After suggesting a lot of their music is quality). How can someone be musically overrated based on their hypocrisy in regards to charity anyway?

You obviously don't understand what a paragraph is, so we will skip that point altogether.