![]() |
Vince McMahon Restarting the XFL
Spoiler for big pic:
Vince McMahon -- Gimmick-free XFL to return in 2020 I'd heard rumors about this but it's still a shock. |
He looks like a Matrix agent two days from retirement before Neo jumps in his guts.
|
What happens on XFL?
Never heard of it. |
Quote:
|
Unfortunately, I had the displeasure of having watched a couple of XFL shows. It was absolute dog ****, and what's hilarious is that they didn't even hide that it was the exact same thing as the WWF, but with football players playing football instead of wrestlers wrestling. Basically, they even had The Rock and Undertaker try to give it a big push because of course they did. Also, there were probably like 2 real football players who had any business playing professionally. Now that the WWE is pretending that their product is legitimate (it isn't), they're going to try and make the XFL look legit (it won't be). |
We already have the Arena Football League and the Indoor Football League in the U.S.
The WWE's modus operandi has been to buy up the competition. They may as well buy one of those leagues and re-brand it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You see WWE bringing in a guy who does a backflip and you think that means they're trying to legitimize it. It can't be that they're trying to stay with what makes money, no its about legitimacy. Vince killed legitimacy to save money on taxes. Now he's going in a direction where he thinks there's money. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Strong Style is something that was developed in Japan by Antonio Inoki. Inoki was both an MMA fighters and a wrestler. He believed that wrestling should be as legitimate looking as possible. He believed this so strongly that he almost ran his own wrestling company into the ground (My journal entry that talks a bit about this). Inoki's old company has recently started to make a comeback pushing the same type of wrestling that's becoming more in line with that style. Vince is merely responding. If you want to say he's imitating the company that wants to be legitimate, I can agree. But i don't think for a moment any one in WWE is concerning themselves with legitimacy. |
You obviously just want to argue, so I'm just gonna end my part by saying that making money in the wrestling business has always been about credibility, and that's probably why when Vince put all of those resources into competing with and beating WCW and ECW, who each had more realistic and believable products at the time, the company and the business saw it's biggest growth. Right now, Vince is losing out on some of those viewers because the UFC and NJPW/ROH offer something with more credibility and legitimacy, whether you want to admit that or not. He's absolutely 100% interested in that.
|
Quote:
also as a side note the XFL has no ties with the WWE this time around. Vince actually sold stocks in WWE to be able to fund this venture by himself. it will still suck though. |
Quote:
|
All I remember about the XFL is that they made this huge deal about how there would be no "fair catch", which is, like, completely uninteresting.
|
if they combined wwe product with football and gave us a irl blitz the league i would be a fan
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
i want the next argument in this topic to be about which la parka is the real la parka
|
Quote:
it factually has no ties to wwe and is funded by Vince that isn’t an opinion, it’s a fact. also comparing the WWE’s numbers to the UFC/any MMA organization is the most non-sensical point you couldve made considering one is a performance art and the other is one of the most physically intense methods of combat around. wrestling is a spectacle. sure, maybe during the days of Hogan and Andre thr Giant people wanted real. but now it’s known and accepted that these are trained professionals out there to put on a show. this is where frownland would say something about seperating your personal opinions from facts etc etc |
the answer is l.a. park btw
|
i wish i could erase the la parka tna run from my mind
|
Quote:
Oh boy. Quote:
|
which la parka are you voting for, maajo
|
La Parka is still around? I remember watching that guy on Nitro back in 1997.
|
thanks for picking l.a. park
|
I had no idea there was even another La Parka. Shows how much I watch wrestling now.
|
Quote:
the original XFL was owned by the company. the new company is owned by Vince McMahon and saw him buy the rights to certain trademarks from the WWE themselves and saw him selling shares of the WWE in order to fund the XFL himself i dunno how i can make it any more clear to you regarding these two points but if you’re gonna keep sticking your tongue out and plugging your ears go for it. people don’t watch wrestling for realism because its 2018 and the internet has been around long enough that any mystique surrounding the spectacle that was the WWF has long died off. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
let me try to dumb it down as much as i can. the WWE is a public owned company in which the McMahon family own approximately 70% of the shares. the wwe owns multiple other business ventures under their brand i.e the WWE Network, a film production company, and formerly the XFL. the newest incarnation of the XFL is owned by Vince McMahon. it is NOT under the WWE umbrella. this means that while yes, the XFL is owned by a man who owns shares in the WWE, it is a seperate entity that runs as it's own company. Quote:
1. hyper realistic traditional wrestling 2. big joke with no credibility the new age of WWE sees the company look to embrace the internet age by giving the fans a different view of the product. lets take for example the massive amount of content filmed outside of the ring that they give on the WWE network. shows that feature wrestlers riding together, wrestling in training facilities, and even off-screen relationships. just because you personally might need something to be realistic in order to enjoy it does not mean that everyone else has the same problem. |
Lol "let me dumb it down" - proceeds to post a bunch of meaningless **** that I don't even want to skim through.
If you can't concede the fact that nothing can survive without the appearance of legitimacy, then I'm basically arguing with saw dust. |
Quote:
this is chula levels of ignorance here. you're continuously saying "no" based on your personal tastes. just because you might value realism so much that you can't enjoy something that doesn't take itself 100% serious does not mean everyone else feels the same. if that was the case WWE would've folded a long, long time ago. but please, continue making arguments based around "lol" and "lmfao" rather than actually understanding that i'm trying to tell you that your personal opinions do not represent those of everyone else. |
Pro wrestling is serious business apparently.
|
Quote:
|
:laughing: Who said anything about wrestling needing to be taking itself seriously? It's funny because WWE's main issue is that they do take themselves way too seriously now. They have the deal with ESPN where they put WWE highlights on SportsCenter, which is absolutely hilarious because it's not even a sport, but no, they're not trying to make themselves look legitimate with that.
|
Quote:
because if WWE weren't taking themselves seriously they would stop promoting and marketing their product to a new audience? |
Quote:
Ladies and gentlemen, Chula 2.... Quote:
Quote:
I was just curious if anybody actually gave a shit about XFL. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.