Great Debate: Are eSports sports? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Sport & Recreation
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-25-2013, 05:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon View Post
I bolded my answers.
This first definition Merriam-Webster lists for sport is:

1 a : a source of diversion : recreation

Just sayin'.
Janszoon is offline  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
Neo-Maxi-Zoom-Dweebie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
This first definition Merriam-Webster lists for sport is:

1 a : a source of diversion : recreation

Just sayin'.
I would side with E-sports being a sport then at that point. I've kind of done a 180 on this. I've listened to both sides and decided why shouldn't it be a sport. Afterall the Kinect and Move both require as much movement as curling.
FRED HALE SR. is offline  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
 
GuitarBizarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
I would side with E-sports being a sport then at that point. I've kind of done a 180 on this. I've listened to both sides and decided why shouldn't it be a sport. Afterall the Kinect and Move both require as much movement as curling.
Can I just say thanks for the bolded part? Realistically I would have been perfectly happy had you still come down on the other side of the debate - though I may have tried to convince you yet.

But I think the most telling part of this is that you've managed to come at this with a mind to consider the other viewpoint, and I think that's been lacking from a lot of the more dismissive or aggressively negative responses to the thread.

I'm perfectly happy to accept the alternate viewpoint here, I'd just like that viewpoint to be presented with a logical thread that answers or attempts to answer the "why" of why whatever people believes defines sport, does so. I think I've tried to remain consistent to that approach so far and I'd like to see the same sort of arguments made, in the absence of tradition but more based on rationale and logic, as to other peoples choice of defining factor, for what a sport is and how defining sport should work on a base level.

Put simply, saying that physicality should define sport is OK and I'm not going to jump down anyone's throat or insult them for thinking so - its just that for me to accept that as a truth, isn't self-evident, and isn't based on simply that it has been so traditionally - I would require a logical basis for not only why this DOES in someones opinion define sport, but why it SHOULD - bearing in mind whether we should seperate out certain things as "sideline" issues like exercise or the social health of the young, which are are not to my mind the end goal of sport - those are the end goals of exercise or socialization, surely?

Having said that I won't jump down peoples throats or insult them for that however, I do find my patience being tested when people's arguments are put forward based on a conviction that eSports - whether defined as proper sport or not - are in some way worthless, or when people seem more concerned with attacking my interests or people who share my interests, rather than trying to debunk or counter my argument. I don't believe we are, or should be, discussing the worth of a sport, only whether it actually is, or is not one.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
As for me, my inbox is as of yet testicle-free, and hopefully remains that way. Don't the rest of you get any ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
I'll have you know, my ancestors were Kings of Wicklow! We're as Irish as losing a three-nil lead in a must-win fixture!
GuitarBizarre is offline  
Old 07-26-2013, 02:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
Boozy Lad
 
Newkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Newport, South Wales
Posts: 482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuitarBizarre View Post
I would say they can definitely be thought of as such. There is perhaps room for a delineation between "sportsmen" (Workplace teams, skilled amateurs, those seeking competition as an extension of their recreational game) "professional sportsmen" (Those playing for some or all of their living wage, or for a prizepool) and "elite sportsmen" (Those aiming to be champions in their own right) in that group though. The key delineation is that if they're taking the time to play in a league, minor or otherwise, that's a sign of a partial or complete change in attitude from "dicking around to have fun" and "Playing to win". It may not be a complete or even significant switch from one to the other, but there's clearly an element there that the casual game doesn't have.
All true but my point was it gets to murky territory. People play on better pitches with mates than they often do in the above "professional" instances. The level of referring/attention to the rules/no obvious bias can also be compared.

I agree in the splitting up of the categories, but in the end it is still all the same sport. Those at the bottom might get sponsors but they certainly won't earn a wage. The desire to win may not be any more than that of a few mates kicking a ball around because that kind of thing is often situational, I'm sure many of the bottom league teams see it as a social gathering-particularly as they will go out and drink after matches, which the "professionals" of course wouldn't. I'm not even sure where to draw the line here, because the situations are so comparable.


Quote:
Originally Posted by GuitarBizarre View Post
Having said that I won't jump down peoples throats or insult them for that however, I do find my patience being tested when people's arguments are put forward based on a conviction that eSports - whether defined as proper sport or not - are in some way worthless, or when people seem more concerned with attacking my interests or people who share my interests, rather than trying to debunk or counter my argument. I don't believe we are, or should be, discussing the worth of a sport, only whether it actually is, or is not one.
Yeah, I definitely don't agree with that. Tbh I think I would get more enjoyment out of playing an e sport ala starcraft than I would playing plenty of things considered sports and at the end of the day, life is about trying to get the most enjoyment out of your time here. I don't really class things like pool/snooker/darts etc as sports but then if it comes to this

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
This first definition Merriam-Webster lists for sport is:

1 a : a source of diversion : recreation

Just sayin'.
why shouldn't they? And why shouldn't Esports? I think my issue isn't in accepting that Esports are sports, but where to draw the line if it is a sport. If that makes sense?I think others earlier on have felt similarly. I mean if the above definition is true, I tend to think making a cup of tea in the office is both a source of diversion-from work-and it allows recreation-ideally talking to someone I'm not sat in the same room with all the time.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofle11 View Post
That's your opinion but you are wrong.
Newkie is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 11:29 AM   #5 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuitarBizarre View Post

I'm perfectly happy to accept the alternate viewpoint here, I'd just like that viewpoint to be presented with a logical thread that answers or attempts to answer the "why" of why whatever people believes defines sport, does so. I think I've tried to remain consistent to that approach so far and I'd like to see the same sort of arguments made, in the absence of tradition but more based on rationale and logic, as to other peoples choice of defining factor, for what a sport is and how defining sport should work on a base level..
lawl, you haven't been acting like it bub.
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.