|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-18-2012, 08:09 AM | #101 (permalink) | ||
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, it auto-corrected to entomology though this obviously isn't about bugs. |
||
04-18-2012, 09:10 AM | #102 (permalink) | |
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
|
I'm not sure I really agree on a minor point here. I think you're mostly right, but I don't see why we shouldn't integrate low impact sports into the general definition of sports, and simply recognise them as a low impact, low physical exertion subcategory. I don't think its much of an argument to redefine a term like sports in order to exclude a thing that has all the qualifying criteria but is applying them in a new fashion.
I don't see a stigma to the word eSports. I think its a fine name for them, I just think they should be thought of as a subsection of traditional sports rather than a separate thing entirely.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2012, 09:44 AM | #103 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
eSport to me says "This is equally as worthless as regular sports, we just do these electronically."
All sports are games - they exist to pass the time. We've just found a market for them at the highest level. eSports, too, are pastimes and now, at the highest level, people are making money. We've just got a century of human-livestock equating sports with a 21st version of a 15th century war. I don't mind that they did that, but they don't have domain over the word. |
04-18-2012, 09:53 AM | #104 (permalink) |
Dat's Der Bunny!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,088
|
I wouldn't integrate them, because they aren't a subsection of traditional sport. In many ways, they are a separate thing entirely, as different as Chess and Boxing. Like I was saying, the only reason they could be considered a "sport" is to distinguish the professionally played form from the amateur "game". So why not remove the ambiguity, and re-brand that alternate, second definition of sport to a word that everyone can then agree on as NOT having any connotations of physical exercise and fitness?
Sport as a word already has a plethora of meanings, as is evident by this thread, it already has connotations that go far beyond the definition. Why make it more confusing by trying to extend it, when it could be simplified? Similarly, why is it so necessary that eSports be given the same Title as physical Sports?
__________________
"I found it eventually, at the bottom of a locker in a disused laboratory, with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard". Ever thought of going into Advertising?" - Arthur Dent |
04-18-2012, 10:15 AM | #105 (permalink) | |
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
|
Because its the seperation, not the differentiation, that leads to the kind of bullcrap attempts to delegitimise the concept of eSports that we've seen in this thread. At the very least if we could agree they were a subcategory, that **** could be pointed towards a rather more simple end result than the 11 page thread we've had to go through here, and we wouldn't have to deal with people like Il Duce, the worst poster ever, trying to troll by bringing up **** that very clearly has nothing to do with any of this discussion. We'd end up a much more inclusive end result where people can do what they want and nobody need get butthurt about the lack of x thing or y aspect in a given sport, (And in so doing, people would be less likely to argue that recognised sports like curling, darts, snooker, and chess, aren't sports), because it would be understood that the umbrella covers one set of stipulations, and the subcategories the others.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2012, 10:30 AM | #106 (permalink) |
Dat's Der Bunny!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,088
|
Yes but, why do they need to be called sports. Noone that I have seen has tried to "delegitimise" them. They require great amounts of skill to play professionally, noone has denied that from what I have seen. Why are they a subcategory? A Sub category has to, by definition, contain ALL the aspects of the parent group. We've argued over and over that eSports don't require the same level of fitness as the set of "games" that most people will agree are "Sports". It would be more true to say that "Sports" under this same majority-definition, are a subcategory of Professionally-Played Games, which is why I am saying it would be better to give a term to define Professionally-played games, rather than applying yet another ambiguous and confusing definition to the already over-defined "Sport".
__________________
"I found it eventually, at the bottom of a locker in a disused laboratory, with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard". Ever thought of going into Advertising?" - Arthur Dent |
04-18-2012, 10:55 AM | #107 (permalink) | ||
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by GuitarBizarre; 04-18-2012 at 11:28 AM. |
||
04-18-2012, 10:59 AM | #108 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
If you're going to put a qualifier in front of what these people do for fun, why not in front of all things people do for fun.
The derivations would have to be broken down to the nth degree just so a bunch of vodka-swilling ego-maniacs can pretend their "accomplishments" are worth a damn. Track and boxing are wildly different. Tennis and baseball are wildly different. Bowlings a sport and its the least physical thing I can imagine. I've worked up more of a sweat playing Starcraft than I have bowling. |
|