Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Sport & Recreation (https://www.musicbanter.com/sport-recreation/)
-   -   Revamping the NHL (https://www.musicbanter.com/sport-recreation/40755-revamping-nhl.html)

Son of JayJamJah 05-21-2009 02:49 PM

Revamping the NHL
 
Here is my proposal for how to improve the quality of play and elevate the NHL back into Americas top four sports.

The Clarence Campbell Western Conference

The Wayne Gretzky Division
Edmonton – The history, the dynasty, a nice run in ’06 to the cup from the #8 seed; a no-brainer to keep.
Calgary – The Great Cup Run to end Edmonton’s Dominance, The Saddle Dome is electric, great uniforms, nickname and logo.
Vancouver – Solid Fans, typically competitive franchise. Need a strong Canadian Base.
Los Angeles\Anaheim – The Los Angeles Kings of Anaheim? Have to have one team from the area, do not need two. The Kings have better nickname, colors, market, Anaheim has better fans, history and arena. Teams combine rosters but do not get dispersal draft picks but they may trade for them.
Winnipeg – Phoenix Moves Back; a third team with Gretzky connections and another Canadian franchise restored.
Colorado – Two Stanley Cups and a part of the best rivalry of the 1990’s. Great nickname, fans and uniforms.

The Gordie Howe Division
Detroit – Original Six; best franchise in the sport the past two decades.
Chicago – Original Six; rising franchise with great fans and young stars.
Toronto – Original Six; still in rebuilding mode, NHL needs them to be good again, the player dispersal draft would give them a chance to improve right away.
Dallas – Dallas stole the franchise from Minnesota but has taken it to new heights. A Stanley Cup championship and a very competitive seven year run in the Western conference keeps Dallas in the league.
St. Louis – The Blues have been a solid franchise for years and just never gotten over the hump, great logo and uniforms and
Minnesota – The nickname has to change back to North Stars, the Wild is awful, has no history and the change would potentially fuel a rivalry between divisional foe and franchise stealing Dallas.

The Prince of Whales Eastern Conference

The Mario Lemueix Division
Pittsburgh – The team in which #66 himself Super Mario suited up for his entire career. One of the best non-original six American hockey cities.
Philadelphia – Much like Pittsburgh, the flyers have a strong fan base and also a pretty nice history.
NY Rangers – Original Six with the least winning tradition but the largest market and a solid draw at MSG.
New Jersey – The Eastern Conference’s top team overall the past 15 years with three cups to show for their efforts.
Washington – The leagues most exciting young talent and an emerging power in the Eastern conference, the switch to the red, white and blue is the best thing they could do.
NY Islanders – The Dynasty through nearly three decades removed makes them to valuable to the sports history to ditch, plus a great nickname and the blue and orange are also delightful.

The Bobby Orr Division
Boston – Original Six team back on the rise. Salary cap was best thing to happen for B’s fans.
Montreal – Original Six team with greatest tradition and legacy; currently going through the franchise’s longest draught.
Ottawa – The Baby of the Canadian franchises nestled comfortably in the heart of the nation’s capital.
Quebec– Bringing the Nordiques back a la the Cleveland Browns, without removing their descendants the Avalanche. This Expansion team would get the first and last pick of each round of the player dispersal draft as well as an extra selection in the middle of the first round.
New England – The return of the Whale. Carolina returns to the Northeast and the franchise’s root as the New England Whalers. Hartford can not sustain a franchise but New England can sustain two.
Buffalo – The Sabres looked to be revived and Buffalo is a fitting market for Hockey.


Franchises to be moved or Change Names
Carolina – To New England (Whalers)
Phoenix – To Winnipeg (Jets)
Los Angeles merges with Anaheim (Kings)
Minnesota (North Stars)


Franchises to be eliminated
Columbus
Atlanta
Nashville
San Jose
Tampa Bay
Florida




Schedule
78 Game Regular Season - Each team plays it’s five divisional foes six times (three home, three away), the six conference foes outside of the division four times each (two home, two away) and the 12 members of the opposing conference twice each (one home, one away).
Return of Divisional Playoff Format – The top four teams from each division make the playoffs, 1vs4 2vs3 and so on from there.
-First and last ten games of each season against divisional opponents.
-Original Six Rivalry Week: The three west teams host the three east teams then vice versa for a specific week each season.


Equipment and Rules Changes
-Shrink the Goalie Pads
-Expand the Ice to International Playing surface Dimensions
-Allow fighting and cut down on cheap shots and chippyness after the whistle.
-Change Scoring back to win\loss\tie 2\0\1 point format.
-Overtime 4 on 4 full 20 minute period no shootout.
-Remove curve restrictions on sticks.


Additional Nuances
-Eliminate the All-Star Game, Expand the Winter Classic to four Games over four days in primetime featuring the top two teams from the year prior in each division. Example: 2010 – Detroit vs. Chicago at Wrigley Field, LA\Anaheim vs. Vancouver on the Beach, Boston\Montreal @ Fenway and Pittsburgh vs. Washington at Hines Field.

ProggyMan 05-21-2009 07:41 PM

Eliminate the Sharks?

Double X 05-21-2009 08:34 PM

I don't think New England can support more than one team...we barely have enough support for the bruins.

Son of JayJamJah 05-21-2009 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan (Post 663940)
Eliminate the Sharks?

Do you have a better plan?

The league needs to be trimmed down, the Sharks are less then 20 years old and have had very little success, plus Hockey in Ca. is an afterthought, one team is enough. Who would you cut?

Son of JayJamJah 05-21-2009 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Double X (Post 663978)
I don't think New England can support more than one team...we barely have enough support for the bruins.

Actually the Bruins did great this year and always had until their owner ruined things by never spending money. I suspect the return of the Whale would really get things cookin' College Hockey is huge in the northeast.

ProggyMan 05-21-2009 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayJamJah (Post 663980)
Do you have a better plan?

The league needs to be trimmed down, the Sharks are less then 20 years old and have had very little success, plus Hockey in Ca. is an afterthought, one team is enough. Who would you cut?

Not one of the most talented, youngest teams with great fan support? Ever taken a trip to the Tank?

Son of JayJamJah 05-21-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan (Post 663982)
Not one of the most talented, youngest teams with great fan support? Ever taken a trip to the Tank?

Never been, but who else would you eliminate if not the Sharks?

ProggyMan 05-21-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayJamJah (Post 663985)
Never been, but who else would you eliminate if not the Sharks?

St. Louis (Even though I'm a fan): Less fan support, inferior, older team. You could say the same things about all but a few teams, the only reason the Sharks are even being considered is because they're an expansion team, no?

Son of JayJamJah 05-21-2009 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan (Post 663990)
St. Louis (Even though I'm a fan): Less fan support, inferior, older team. You could say the same things about all but a few teams, the only reason the Sharks are even being considered is because they're an expansion team, no?

The reason I considered the Sharks is because they are one of the more recent expansion teams yes, but also because of their location and nickname.

I have no patience for Sharks, Ducks, Raptors, Grizzlies, Heat, Magic,, Wild etc.

Your nickname should reflect your town and not be a chic cartoon animal.

St. Louis is one of the original NHL expansion teams from the late 1960's. I remember when Scotty Bowman coached them, they have a lot more history and went just as far as the sharks did in the playoffs this year (sorry).

It's a valid contention though,the franchise is not doing as well as it once did but I still think one team in Cali is plenty.

I'm not sure the Sharks are more popular then the Blues however. STL is a great sports town and they love their Blues, I get the impression Sharks fans are very few in numbers but passionate. What's your impression on that, being out there?

ProggyMan 05-21-2009 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayJamJah (Post 663997)
The reason I considered the Sharks is because they are one of the more recent expansion teams yes, but also because of their location and nickname.

I have no patience for Sharks, Ducks, Raptors, Grizzlies, Heat, Magic,, Wild etc.

Your nickname should reflect your town and not be a chic cartoon animal.

St. Louis is one of the original NHL expansion teams from the late 1960's. I remember when Scotty Bowman coached them, they have a lot more history and went just as far as the sharks did in the playoffs this year (sorry).

It's a valid contention though,the franchise is not doing as well as it once did but I still think one team in Cali is plenty.

I'm not sure the Sharks are more popular then the Blues however. STL is a great sports town and they love their Blues, I get the impression Sharks fans are very few in numbers but passionate. What's your impression on that, being out there?

I know the Sharks are an expansion team and it's certainly a valid point, but the Tank is packed every night (Don't know the exact numbers, just personal experience) and the Sharks have been one of the most successful teams in the regular season this decade. I don't see your point about 1 team being enough for Cali, we're basically split into two states...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.