|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-03-2010, 09:34 AM | #41 (permalink) |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
sorry i keep crapping in your thread but again, i have a really hard time calling Jane's Addiction funk rock (especially not Jane Says). i think they got lumped into the style because they didn't fit anywhere else and 'alternative' rock hadn't become an MTV word of the day.
Been Caught Stealing is on the funky side but it's almost like anything from the 90s where the guitar isn't strummed in straight time is being considered 'funk rock' and i think it's rather ridiculous. yes there were plenty of bands with some funk elements to them and JA was one, but that's it, they had some elements of it - about as much as Led Zeppelin (The Crunge is funky - should LZ be listed as funk rock next?) |
08-03-2010, 06:32 PM | #42 (permalink) | |
Divination
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
|
Quote:
Thats what always impressed me the most about the Isley Brothers and Funkadelic/Parliament, the 'rock guitar' with these two bands are as equal to the funk aspect musically. These guitar players were not only rivals to Jimi Hendrix, but also directly influenced by him. Janes Addiction is only considered as an influence to funk rock, not in any way trying to imply they are 'Funk Rock'. |
|
08-04-2010, 10:05 AM | #44 (permalink) |
Divination
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
|
To be honest Dave, the opinion that JA influenced todays funk rock comes from wikipedia, I believe.
So you know how that is..like you've stated before Dave "wkipedia is not always completely accurate", which is an opinion that I tend to agree with. You know, somehow I think that 'Funk Rock' or some form of style closely related to the funk genre anyway, is far from hitting its 'peak' yet, funk has really only been accepted by the masses (musically) in the last 20 years or so, for example, five or ten years ago, If I suggested that certain songs within different genres outside the funk genre, like say 'country' for instance, "had a nice funk groove to it", the suggestion would be laughed at or completely ignored, as having no viability. I kind of see the RHCPs as the 'first' real 'Funk Rock' band, and everything before that was still within process musically (influence). |
08-04-2010, 02:47 PM | #45 (permalink) |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
yeah i see where you're coming from. the thing is there always seem to be a little funk out there it just never makes it to the top of the pile before breaking apart. regardless of the generation. it always gets a little too bland as it gets closer to mainstream acceptance. the masses can only handle the funk in small doses hehehe
|
08-04-2010, 11:36 PM | #46 (permalink) | |
FUNky
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808 sometimes I don't thrill you sometimes I think I'll kill you just don't let me fuck up will you 'cause when I need a friend it's still you |
|
08-05-2010, 08:56 AM | #47 (permalink) |
Divination
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
|
I agree that funk can get very repetitious, as so do alot of other genre's & sub-genre's. Bass guitar was rarely ever as prominent in popular music as it is today, especially since the 90s, which can be a positive in one aspect, or negative in another.
I will admit, I do get a little excited when I hear a lead guitarist play something that is more on the 'artistic' side, with todays music. |
08-05-2010, 09:53 AM | #48 (permalink) |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
agreed. it's freaking awesome when a little bit of the good sh!t squeezes through into the mainstream. the only problem is there are always some vultures and mimics ready to milk it. i think the last time funky 'rock' music came close to mainstream prevalence was with the Dave Matthew's Band and they totally encapsulate my earlier theory about funk getting blander as it gets more popular.
there's no denying the rhythm section of the DMB can be incredibly funky, but it lacks the dirtiness of real uncut funk. it's something Flea tried expressing to no end in his interviews in the 80s - playing funk was about being dirty, it was about releasing it all with little or no regard on how it came across because you knew deep down inside that the funk was pure. but as it gets closer to mainstream acceptance, more fingers touch the pie, too many spoons stir the soup, and your left with a mess of the kind of bland watered down funk that goes nowhere besides away. |
08-05-2010, 10:03 AM | #49 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
|
|
08-05-2010, 10:19 AM | #50 (permalink) |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
actually i'd call a lot of the 70s stuff dirty. i'm talking more like overall tone and feel, not necessarily raunchiness. we both know 'feel' is a hard thing to peg down, but it's like the difference between using a horn section or a synth, or to compose every roll and change rather than loosely jam out around basic ideas.
or just think back to any other time you find yourself wanting to use the terms 'juicy fart bass' and odds are you're hearing something i'd be calling the good dirty stuff hahahaha. |
|