The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, rock, ballad, album) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, rock, ballad, album)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones 1,000,000,059 99.90%
Beatles 1,000,073 0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-15-2009, 07:36 AM   #10 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swink View Post
The Beatles early work was very well done, but they took a weird curve some time along the White Album and started doing nothing but silly pop/radio songs, while the Stones kept their original feel and somehow managed to not become boring.

Anyway, you can't really compare these two bands. The Beatles can be compared to, say, The Animals, and the Stones can be compared to bands like Yardbirds, Poison, etc.
Why on earth would you compare the Stones to Poison?
Janszoon is offline  
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.