The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, rock, ballad, album) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones 1,000,000,059 99.90%
Beatles 1,000,073 0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-07-2009, 01:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
I know a lot of folks from the 60's and I always like to put them on the spot, as if I was interrogating them, and sternly ask...who do you like better?
What are you an obnoxious orderly at a retirement home??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
Beatlemania began to wane with the release of the White Album,
wrong! misinformation, It start to wane right after August 29th, 1966, technically speaking, it was the last time they did thier last concert at Candlestick Park for the last time.

The Beatles were the only band that started out as a girl band that went Underground. "Waning" and other words to discribe The Beatles endeavors of pushing the envelope of crafting high quality music is putting a misleading spin on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
I think there's still a little resentment and may be even some blame placed on the Stones for the Beatles demise.
wrong! misinformation, It wasn't the Rolling Stones, it was Yoko Ono; and Paul releasing his solo album, that was the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Comus View Post
Q: Then why don't rolling stones fans dislike Led Zeppelin for taking their pedestal?

A: Becuase Rolling Stones fans aren't little jealous shits with no taste in music.
I highly respect you for your trival knowelge of obscure bands, groups, and/or artist, and you definitely deserve a for Grammy for Wyatting.
But and that is a big but, one thing I don't get his you vehement distaste for the world's most tasteful Rock n Roll band ever. How can you forget their most delicious number, Savory Truffle?

Yeah, The Rolling Stones might not be jealous of Led Zeppelin but is becuase The Stones have some firsts on Led Zep, Like The Stones was the first Blues Band coming from England, The UK and/or the British Isles. And even though Jimmy Page's Les Paul may be the most famous of all Les Pauls in the world, Keith Richards was the first guy to own one in the whole of England, The UK and/or the British Isles. And besides Zep & Stones took the blues into similar but different areas, I think the latter became more bluesier with the gutiarist by the name of Mick Taylor, lets face it LZ & RS are compatible.

But I do have to admit as a Rolling Stone fan, when I was a kid I was completely annoyed with KISS fans who touted KISS as the greatest RnR band in the world. And is because kiss couldn't play one lick to save Aunt Edna.

Last edited by Neapolitan; 06-07-2009 at 01:49 PM. Reason: Editing grammar.
Neapolitan is offline  
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.