The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, rock, ballad, album)

Son of JayJamJah · 12-08-2008, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johhny Rhythm

While both are good, I find the Beatles to be better.

And though I like the Stones, I think they're very overplayed and overrated.

Both bands could fall under that heading, but I think it's unfair. Most of the Stones best stuff rarely gets air time. Listen to Beggars Banquet (I'll send you six tracks to wet your beak if you like) and tell me what you think, that album is awesome, and should be respected as such, but is overlooked.

Double X · 01-06-2009, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayJamJah

Both bands could fall under that heading, but I think it's unfair. Most of the Stones best stuff rarely gets air time. Listen to Beggars Banquet (I'll send you six tracks to wet your beak if you like) and tell me what you think, that album is awesome, and should be respected as such, but is overlooked.

I think I am the only one who actually prefers Let It Bleed.

Brad Stengel · 01-21-2009, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Double X

I think I am the only one who actually prefers Let It Bleed.

Sometimes I prefer Let It Bleed. I feel like Let It Bleed has better individual songs, while Beggars Banquet is more solid as an album.

Zarko · 01-21-2009, 05:41 PM

I just KNEW the right band would take over the lead sooner or later

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones	1,000,000,059	99.90%
Beatles	1,000,073	0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

01-21-2009, 05:41 PM	#4 (permalink)
Zarko Barely Disheveled Zombie Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 1,196	I just KNEW the right band would take over the lead sooner or later