The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, rock, ballad, album)

thedaytripper · 07-08-2008, 10:34 AM

The beatles were far better than the rolling stones. no questions asked. they went from pop icons, who delivered awesome british tone to us, to psychedelic crooners who increased our hope during vietnam, to poetic rock legends. George Harrison (R.I.P.) was silent and had no ego while completely owning keith richards on guitar. Ringo had elegant and followable drum beats, Paul McCartney was and is one of the greatest musicians ever, and R.I.P. John who was incredible on the mic, the guitar, piano, and the grindstone. The stones are great, no doubt, but they cannot compare to the beatles

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones	1,000,000,059	99.90%
Beatles	1,000,073	0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

07-08-2008, 10:34 AM	#11 (permalink)
thedaytripper Groupie Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 30	The beatles were far better than the rolling stones. no questions asked. they went from pop icons, who delivered awesome british tone to us, to psychedelic crooners who increased our hope during vietnam, to poetic rock legends. George Harrison (R.I.P.) was silent and had no ego while completely owning keith richards on guitar. Ringo had elegant and followable drum beats, Paul McCartney was and is one of the greatest musicians ever, and R.I.P. John who was incredible on the mic, the guitar, piano, and the grindstone. The stones are great, no doubt, but they cannot compare to the beatles