Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
I just think it`s unfair to claim the Beatles are better than the Stones because the Stones lost in it the 70s when the Beatles couldn`t even hold it together in that decade.
|
Perhaps because they broke up, you're comparing a bands 70s material to a band that wasn't even together anymore during the 70s, so whos really being unfair here?
And Music Man, you're not really helping the Beatlemaniacs with their cause, why bring up record sales like it proves The Beatles are better?... Its not a very good case, and its a waste of everyones time. Besides there are thousands of valid reasons why The Beatles are better than The Rolling Stones, use those.
And Big3, a good deal of The Beatles later material was pretty ahead of their time, can you really imagine a song like
Tommorrow Never Knows being released in 1966?
And implying that The Beatles are the "lowest common denominator" is just plain retarded.
Threaded Mode