The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, rock, ballad, album) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones 1,000,000,059 99.90%
Beatles 1,000,073 0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-11-2007, 02:29 AM   #10 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentleman Johnny View Post
which do you prefer, and why? id hafta say the stones, because they were much more diverse than the beatles, and to me, the beatles songs all sound the same.
????!!!!

So you don't think "Yesterday" and "Helter Skelter" are musically diverse?!

"I Wanna Hold Your Hand" and "Strawberry Fields Forever"?!

"Rocky Raccoon" and "Come Together"?!

The Beatles were more diverse than the Stones could ever hope to be, and I say that as a big Stones fan myself.
__________________
"Paranoid is just like an anchor. It really secures everything about the metal movement in one record. It's all there: the riffs, the vocal performance of Ozzy, the song titles, what the lyrics are about. It's just a classic defining moment."

--Rob Halford of Judas Priest
Music Man is offline  
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.