The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (lyrics, rock, single, genre) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones 1,000,000,059 99.90%
Beatles 1,000,073 0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2006, 07:38 PM   #191 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
The Beatles went out in their prime, The Stones have been way past their prime for over 20 years, imo.
Again, your point is correct. Though I would say they've been past their prime for over 30 years.
__________________
"Paranoid is just like an anchor. It really secures everything about the metal movement in one record. It's all there: the riffs, the vocal performance of Ozzy, the song titles, what the lyrics are about. It's just a classic defining moment."

--Rob Halford of Judas Priest
Music Man is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 07:39 PM   #192 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by franscar
I guess for me it's that growing up the first reference point I ever had of the Stones was Jagger making an almighty tit of himself on 'Dancing in the Street'. That isn't something you can easily forget when you're young. It influences you. It took me years to summon up the courage to listen to a Bowie album because of that song.
haha, true, at times it is hard to seperate someone's actual personality from the music they make. I'll admit i've made similar judgements, it's one of the reasons that i'm not all that big on metalica. I acknowledge that it's not the most rational way to judge music, but still, at times it's very hard to make that distinction.
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 07:52 PM   #193 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by franscar
Why do you disagree when that's pretty much what I said only in different words?
I primarily disagreed with the part that they broke up "too soon". IMO, they broke up at just the right time. By 1970--drugs, Yoko, and their egos had taken an incredible toll on the Fab Four.

For all we know, if they had stayed together, we may very well have seen a substantial decrease in the quality of their music in any subsequent albums.

IMO, things worked out for the best.

On a personal level, I'm impressed that the Stones could stay together this long and not hate each others guts. But people need to face the hard truth--the Stones are only a skeleton of their former greatness.
__________________
"Paranoid is just like an anchor. It really secures everything about the metal movement in one record. It's all there: the riffs, the vocal performance of Ozzy, the song titles, what the lyrics are about. It's just a classic defining moment."

--Rob Halford of Judas Priest
Music Man is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 07:54 PM   #194 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Music Man
I primarily disagreed with the part that they broke up "too soon". IMO, they broke up at just the right time. By 1970--drugs, Yoko, and their egos had taken an incredible toll on the Fab Four.

For all we know, if they had stayed together, we may very well have seen a substantial decrease in the quality of their music in any subsequent albums.

IMO, things worked out for the best.

On a personal level, I'm impressed that the Stones could stay together this long and not hate each others guts. But people need to face the hard truth--the Stones are only a skeleton of their former greatness.
yeah, but does the fact that they're not making great music anymore diminish the quality af their music from years ago?
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 08:01 PM   #195 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibber
yeah, but does the fact that they're not making great music anymore diminish the quality af their music from years ago?
Your point is irrelevant.

The Beatles have sold over a BILLION records worldwide, hundreds of millions more than the Stones. The Beatles were also far more influential both musically and socially than the Stones.

So the PEOPLE (of many countries and cultures) have spoken--the Beatles reign supreme over the Stones.
__________________
"Paranoid is just like an anchor. It really secures everything about the metal movement in one record. It's all there: the riffs, the vocal performance of Ozzy, the song titles, what the lyrics are about. It's just a classic defining moment."

--Rob Halford of Judas Priest
Music Man is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 08:08 PM   #196 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,536
Default

I agree that the beatles were more influential than the stones, but how does that make them a better band? For that matter, how do record sales make them a better band either? The beatles were a pop band, so it stands to reason that they'd be pretty damn popular. The stones, while hugely popular, were always a rock band. taking it a step further, you could argue that because Britney spears has sold more records than the stones, she's a better artist than the stones.
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 08:29 PM   #197 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibber
I agree that the beatles were more influential than the stones, but how does that make them a better band? For that matter, how do record sales make them a better band either? The beatles were a pop band, so it stands to reason that they'd be pretty damn popular. The stones, while hugely popular, were always a rock band. taking it a step further, you could argue that because Britney spears has sold more records than the stones, she's a better artist than the stones.
Your reasoning is fallacious, and some of your facts incorrect.

No, the Stones weren't always a rock band. They've released a lot of pop tunes (and crappy pop at that), and even stooped so low as to record disco-style songs.

The Beatles were immensely popular because of the sheer greatness of their music, not because it was their goal to write popular songs. Songs like "Helter Skelter", "I am the Walrus" and "Revolution #9"--as well most of their other songs--certainly weren't written with "popularity" in mind.

AC/DC has always played ear-splitting hard rock, and they've done it so well that their music has become popular with many people. But that doesn't mean their music belongs in the "pop" music genre. Pop music is Britney Spears, the Backstreet Boys and other "fluff stuff".
__________________
"Paranoid is just like an anchor. It really secures everything about the metal movement in one record. It's all there: the riffs, the vocal performance of Ozzy, the song titles, what the lyrics are about. It's just a classic defining moment."

--Rob Halford of Judas Priest
Music Man is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 08:37 PM   #198 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Music Man
Your reasoning is fallacious, and some of your facts incorrect.

No, the Stones weren't always a rock band. They've released a lot of pop tunes (and crappy pop at that), and even stooped so low as to record disco-style songs.

The Beatles were immensely popular because of the sheer greatness of their music, not because it was their goal to write popular songs. Songs like "Helter Skelter", "I am the Walrus" and "Revolution #9"--as well most of their other songs--certainly weren't written with "popularity" in mind.

AC/DC has always played ear-splitting hard rock, and they've done it so well that their music has become popular with many people. But that doesn't mean their music belongs in the "pop" music genre. Pop music is Britney Spears, the Backstreet Boys and other "fluff stuff".
Pop music isn't just britney spears and backstreet boys (crap in other words). A lot of really great music, innovative music, and influential music, such as the beatles can be described as pop. Don't get me wrong, the beatles are one of my all time favortie bands, and I consider their lyrics to be some of the best ever written, but I also thing that just because the stones made some crap songs, it doesnt diminish the fact that they made some really amazing, innovative, and influential music as well. I just have a different way of looking at it than you do, it doesnt make it wrong.
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 08:39 PM   #199 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
bungalow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hot-lanta
Posts: 3,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Music Man
Your point is irrelevant.

The Beatles have sold over a BILLION records worldwide, hundreds of millions more than the Stones. The Beatles were also far more influential both musically and socially than the Stones.

So the PEOPLE (of many countries and cultures) have spoken--the Beatles reign supreme over the Stones.
Actually, The Stones are the best selling band of all time.
They sold more records than the Beatles
But the beatles are better and more influential.
bungalow is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 08:45 PM   #200 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Stones not infuencial?

Oh come on , every single rock guitarist going has copied Keith at some point.Be it look , riff , pose or attitude.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.