The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, bass, pop, rock)

Shooting Star · 01-23-2006, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

Hmmm

I know which one i`d rather listen to

The guy who looks like a grandfather, or the guy who looks like he went through a mid-life crisis that continued into senility?

~~bungalow~~ · 01-23-2006, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

Hmmm

I know which one i`d rather listen to

Those pictures weren't taken in the same year, and, Paul sucks. Listen to some Lennon. That guy is one of the greatest songwriters ever. He didn't have to wank out some long, lame guitar solo to get everyone to love his music. Plus, the Rolling Stones, sold a song to Microsoft....LAME!

sleepy jack · 01-23-2006, 10:03 PM

I don't think urban is seroiusly making image his reason for picking the rolling stones, because hes a fanboy yes

image no.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 01-23-2006, 10:08 PM

Hey if music man can talk sh*t for f*ck knows how many pages , whats wrong with one post in return to balance it?

~~bungalow~~ · 01-23-2006, 10:15 PM

Nothing at all. haha

Seltzer · 01-23-2006, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357

Those pictures weren't taken in the same year, and, Paul sucks. Listen to some Lennon. That guy is one of the greatest songwriters ever. He didn't have to wank out some long, lame guitar solo to get everyone to love his music. Plus, the Rolling Stones, sold a song to Microsoft....LAME!

Mmm... Paul's a good bassist though.

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 01-24-2006, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357

Those pictures weren't taken in the same year, and, Paul sucks. Listen to some Lennon. That guy is one of the greatest songwriters ever. He didn't have to wank out some long, lame guitar solo to get everyone to love his music. Plus, the Rolling Stones, sold a song to Microsoft....LAME!

Lol, imagine writing a whole band off because they sold out a song to Microsoft...IMAGINE!!!

boo boo · 01-24-2006, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seltzer

Mmm... Paul's a good bassist though.

Of course.

I think Paul is overrated as a songwriter (But still great, just as much as Lennon is) but underrated as an actual musician.

There is a difference ya know.

boo boo · 01-24-2006, 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shooting Star

The Beatles aren't really rock and roll themselves (although some of their covers are primarily that) but you can see the influence of bands like the shadows and Cliff Richard and Chuck Berry and Elvis.

I hate it when people say something isnt rock because it is pop...Which is stupid, the thin line between those two arent so great.

Rock N Roll is really just a variation of pop music, anyway.

The_Juke · 01-24-2006, 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angela

which do you prefer, and why? id hafta say the stones, because they were much more diverse than the beatles, and to me, the beatles songs all sound the same.

You have been hitting the pipe!

Both bands have a difinative sound but the Beatles played everything from cheezy pop, phycadelic/trip, guitar Rock, and blues.

Let's see.... Yellow Submarine, Drive My Car, Revolution, Somthing, Help, Rocky Raccoon

The Stones just Rocked...

Did anyone catch the season opener for the Patriots when the Stones played? Did you see Keith Ricahrds on his knee's and think he fell?

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones	1,000,000,059	99.90%
Beatles	1,000,073	0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

01-23-2006, 10:08 PM	#304 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	Hey if music man can talk sht for fck knows how many pages , whats wrong with one post in return to balance it? __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

01-23-2006, 10:15 PM	#305 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	Nothing at all. haha