The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles

Urban Hat€monger ? · 05-27-2009, 05:08 PM

I'm going to have to put the Stones best stuff from 1964 rather than 1965

I mean in 64 they released Not Fade Away , It's All Over Now , Time Is on My Side , Heart Of Stone & Little Red Rooster as singles. If your going to count the Beatles 'good' stuff from 63 with stuff like I Want to Hold Your Hand or Love Me Do, then I think the Stones can be given those songs.

boo boo · 05-27-2009, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

The Stones put out some fantastic singles in the 70s. Even if you don't rate their albums I don't see how anyone can dispute that.

Well Angie is a great song, I can't deny that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

Heh. Honestly I didn't even think it would be all that controversial of a statement. I've always understood that even Beatles fanboys don't give much respect to their output prior to Rubber Soul. That gives them four years of making good music, five if you like Let It Be. Even if one is to say that the Stones didn't start making really notable music until 1965, the same year Rubber Soul came out, the Stones still put out quality music for at least twice as long as the Beatles.

I think you're wrong about that one. Meet the Beatles, Beatles For Sale, Hard Days Night and Help! are all excellent pop records. And just about any true Beatles fan will tell you that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

I'm going to have to put the Stones best stuff from 1964 rather than 1965

I mean in 64 they released Not Fade Away , It's All Over Now , Time Is on My Side , Heart Of Stone & Little Red Rooster as singles. If your going to count the Beatles 'good' stuff from 63 with stuff like I Want to Hold Your Hand or Love Me Do, then I think the Stones can be given those songs.

Well except for Heart of Stone, those are all covers, I was talking about when they started writing their own material. But whatever, you got me there.

And convenient how you forgot to mention I Wanna Be Your Man. Hmm.... I wonder why.

**Janszoon** · 05-27-2009, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

I think you're wrong there. Meet the Beatles, Beatles For Sale, Hard Days Night and Help! are all excellent pop records. And just about any true Beatles fan will tell you that.

Haha. I love how you qualify it as "any true Beatles fan" like all those Beatles fans who disagree are somehow fake.

boo boo · 05-27-2009, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

Haha. I love how you qualify it as "any true Beatles fan" like all those Beatles fans who disagree are somehow fake.

Ok, that was a very snobby and elitist thing to say. I apologise.

But I don't know many Beatles fans who dismiss their early work. So I don't know where you got that from. I think you're very wrong.

**Janszoon** · 05-27-2009, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Ok, that was a very snobby and elitist thing to say. I apologise.

But I don't know many Beatles fans who dismiss their early work. So I don't know where you got that from. I think you're very wrong.

And I don't think I'm wrong. Imagine that!

Urban Hat€monger ? · 05-27-2009, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

And convenient how you forgot to mention I Wanna Be Your Man. Hmm.... I wonder why.

Because it came out in 1963

Neapolitan · 05-27-2009, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

The Beatles were good from 1963 up until their break up.

The Stones were good from 1965 until 1972.

So nah, they both had an equally long run as far as quality is concerned. And The Beatles at least knew when to quit.

I think the Rolling Stones consistently put out good albums from their debut album England's Newest Hit Makers to Tattoo You. OK, some albums were weaker then other but every unpopular Stone's album had at least one or more classic tracks on it. England's Newest Hit Makers and 12X5 even though kind of basic compare to the Stone's later stuff are two very good albums, the first one being one of my favorite Stone's album, I love every song on that album, a lot of classic blue songs, It's All Over Now and Time Is On My Side are classic tracks from 12X5.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 05-27-2009, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan

I think the Rolling Stones consistently put out good albums from their debut album England's Newest Hit Makers to Tattoo You.

Finally someone agrees with me

Brad Stengel · 05-27-2009, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

Finally someone agrees with me

Honestly, I fucking despise Some Girls and everything after. The albums after Exile are all decenttolerable at very best.

Neapolitan · 05-27-2009, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Stengel

Honestly, I ****ing despise Some Girls

"Hey, what's the matter, man? We're going to come around at 12
With some Puerto Rican girls that's just dying to meet you
We're going to bring a case of wine
Hey, let's go mess and fool around, you know, like we used to"

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones	1,000,000,059	99.90%
Beatles	1,000,073	0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

05-27-2009, 05:08 PM	#731 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	I'm going to have to put the Stones best stuff from 1964 rather than 1965 I mean in 64 they released Not Fade Away , It's All Over Now , Time Is on My Side , Heart Of Stone & Little Red Rooster as singles. If your going to count the Beatles 'good' stuff from 63 with stuff like I Want to Hold Your Hand or Love Me Do, then I think the Stones can be given those songs. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.