|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which is best? | |||
Live at Leeds by The Who |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 48.78% |
How The West Was Won by Led Zeppelin |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 51.22% |
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
|
![]()
I think a comparison between the two albums by The Who and Led Zeppelin is valid for several reasons:
- Both came from pioneers of the hard rock sound with base in the blues. - They were recorded just two years apart. - The bands had the same ensemble of a bassist, a drummer, a guitarist and a vocalist. So, which one do you prefer? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
![]() Quote:
I have never listened to the Led Zeppelin one, but because it's Zeppelin, it's probably excellent. I like Live At Leeds for the amazing performances of the songs from Tommy as well as "Young Man Blues" and the older stuff. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
|
![]()
I haven't actually decided yet.
I'm leaning towards Live at Leeds, because the drumming and bass playing is better and more explosive, but Jimmy Page is a better guitar player than Townshend. Then again, The Who does have more wit than Led Zeppelin in the chat between songs, which plays a bit part on Live at Leeds. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: classified
Posts: 639
|
![]() Quote:
Anyway, I picked "How The West Was Won" because it keeps me interested throughout the whole album and has so much more variety, whether Jimmy Page is shredding his acoustic guitar in their countryesque jam Bron-Yr-Aur-Stomp, or Plant is wildly throwing out his passionate cries in the bluesy "Since I've Been Loving You". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Way Out There
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 850
|
![]()
I'm down with Live at Leeds. I prefer the original non-expanded version. Yes the Deluxe version gives a a more rounded version of the band, but when talking about one of the best live albums, I'm thinking
Side A A1 Young Man A2 Substitute A3 Summertime Blues A4 Shakin' All Over Side B B1 My Generation B2 Magic Bus
__________________
rock n music blog |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 531
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
/
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Conn
Posts: 1,338
|
![]()
I've owned Leeds for longer, but Led Zeppelin was just a better live band (here). Some of the songs don't work so well, but the overall quality of recording and musicianship is certainly better on the Zeppelin album.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|