10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (rock, Ringo)

Urban Hat€monger ? · 11-17-2008, 01:09 PM

Well considering the whole reason this was started was as satire due to Beatles fans who can't give the Stones one ounce of credit I think that post summed it up nicely.

Veronica Lodge · 11-17-2008, 01:15 PM

Hahaha. I guess it did.

Folkie2 · 11-17-2008, 02:42 PM

ok the stones and the beatles are both really good bands but you're only pointing out the bad stuff in the beatles. what about john lennons and george harrisons solo careers or later on in their career when they weren't writing kiidie pop you have to give the beatles some credit i mean you've got to sell a lot of records to buy those matching suits

~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ · 11-17-2008, 05:59 PM

No comment.

Fletch · 11-19-2008, 06:43 AM

These threads are hilarious - the world would be a MUCH lesser planet without either of these bands (unless parallel universes can prove otherwise) - end of debate!

Comus · 11-19-2008, 07:49 AM

Yeah it would be less crappy.

Veronica Lodge · 11-19-2008, 08:40 AM

Hahaha Urban, your avatar is HILARIOUS. Hahaha.

petebragansa · 12-06-2008, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dac

"Realness?" Wtf is that?

I mean the drummer in the Stones is much much better. Let's say on the R&B scale...Charlie Watts is a SERIOUS drummer. Like he could rock with Coltrane! I mean that seriously. Meanwhile, you pile on top of that just about anything, with all due respect, and it will sound good. No disrespect to Ringo.

Peter Bragansa

Rickenbacker · 05-23-2009, 06:16 PM

*cough* A Day In the Life, anyone?

argument disproven

:o

khfreek · 05-23-2009, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rickenbacker

*cough* A Day In the Life, anyone?

argument disproven

:o

What would we do without a great mind like yours on our board?

11-17-2008, 01:09 PM	#261 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	Well considering the whole reason this was started was as satire due to Beatles fans who can't give the Stones one ounce of credit I think that post summed it up nicely. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

11-17-2008, 01:15 PM	#262 (permalink)
Veronica Lodge Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Riverdale. Posts: 174	Hahaha. I guess it did. __________________ - Veronica Lodge - Yes, that IS what I said.

11-19-2008, 06:43 AM	#265 (permalink)
Fletch Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 82	These threads are hilarious - the world would be a MUCH lesser planet without either of these bands (unless parallel universes can prove otherwise) - end of debate! __________________ No Bosses, Just Music

11-19-2008, 08:40 AM	#267 (permalink)
Veronica Lodge Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Riverdale. Posts: 174	Hahaha Urban, your avatar is HILARIOUS. Hahaha. __________________ - Veronica Lodge - Yes, that IS what I said.

11-17-2008, 02:42 PM	#263 (permalink)
Folkie2 Groupie Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Kingston, On Posts: 10	ok the stones and the beatles are both really good bands but you're only pointing out the bad stuff in the beatles. what about john lennons and george harrisons solo careers or later on in their career when they weren't writing kiidie pop you have to give the beatles some credit i mean you've got to sell a lot of records to buy those matching suits

11-17-2008, 05:59 PM	#264 (permalink)
~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,538	No comment.

05-23-2009, 06:16 PM	#269 (permalink)
Rickenbacker / Join Date: May 2009 Location: The Conn Posts: 1,338	cough A Day In the Life, anyone? argument disproven :o