10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)

Axiomatic Wiki · 12-05-2009, 05:06 AM

I think the two bands are not really comparable. Beatles are a lot of things, but they are not what the Stones are, Hard Rock. The only things they have in common are their time periods and the impact they had on music. Anyone who prefers hard rock to psychedelic pop will most likely like the stones better, where as vice versa, would probably prefer The Beatles. Their styles are so different, and they were both innovates and masters of their styles of music.

That said, I definitely prefer The Beatles ^_^

12-05-2009, 05:06 AM	#11 (permalink)
Axiomatic Wiki Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Souvlaki Space Station Posts: 99	I think the two bands are not really comparable. Beatles are a lot of things, but they are not what the Stones are, Hard Rock. The only things they have in common are their time periods and the impact they had on music. Anyone who prefers hard rock to psychedelic pop will most likely like the stones better, where as vice versa, would probably prefer The Beatles. Their styles are so different, and they were both innovates and masters of their styles of music. That said, I definitely prefer The Beatles ^_^ __________________ http://www.last.fm/user/AxiomaticWiki Last edited by Axiomatic Wiki; 12-05-2009 at 05:28 AM.