10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2008, 11:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
dac
MB's Biggest Fanboy
 
dac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 2,852
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comus View Post
Beatles are over-hyped, over played and utterly dull mixing bland pop with even blander ****e. They're like the Radiohead of the 60's no real talent and nothing brilliant to prove their popularity, just for some reason it's cool to like them.
What do you define talent as? Because to say those bands have no talent is just plane dumb. Are they overrated? Probably. But that doesn't mean they aren't good. Listen to 'Something' or 'Pyramid Song' and tell me that those are bad songs.
__________________
dac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2008, 01:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
I'm sorry, is this Can?
 
Comus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,989
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by dac View Post
What do you define talent as? Because to say those bands have no talent is just plane dumb. Are they overrated? Probably. But that doesn't mean they aren't good. Listen to 'Something' or 'Pyramid Song' and tell me that those are bad songs.
Musical talent is very different from the talent we should expect of popular bands, simply being able to play what has been played for decades is not true talent. Sure it might take skill, and practise, but if you're unable to expand, and to make it interesting it is worth nothing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepy jack
Quote:
Originally Posted by antonio
classical music isn't exactly religious, you know?
um
last.fm
Comus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2008, 01:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Veronica Lodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Riverdale.
Posts: 174
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comus View Post
Musical talent is very different from the talent we should expect of popular bands, simply being able to play what has been played for decades is not true talent. Sure it might take skill, and practise, but if you're unable to expand, and to make it interesting it is worth nothing.
So, in all honesty, how come you don't like Radiohead?

(Judging by your avatar...)
__________________
- Veronica Lodge -


Yes, that IS what I said.
Veronica Lodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.