10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-04-2008, 11:02 AM   #11 (permalink)
dac
MB's Biggest Fanboy
 
dac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Comus View Post
Beatles are over-hyped, over played and utterly dull mixing bland pop with even blander ****e. They're like the Radiohead of the 60's no real talent and nothing brilliant to prove their popularity, just for some reason it's cool to like them.
What do you define talent as? Because to say those bands have no talent is just plane dumb. Are they overrated? Probably. But that doesn't mean they aren't good. Listen to 'Something' or 'Pyramid Song' and tell me that those are bad songs.
__________________

dac is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.