10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)

joyboyo53 · 03-19-2008, 05:15 PM

since irrelevance is key in these rankings....

10 reasons why the beatles ARE better than the rolling stones

1 - john lennon is super cool

2 - so is paul & george

3 - who is prettier now? http://www.usounds.com/wp/wp-content...thrichards.jpg
http://www.facade.com/celebrity/phot..._McCartney.jpg

4 - the beatles stopped performing because they didnt need to advertise their albums (the initial reason for touring) any further and wanted to spend more time making studio albums that were revolutionary at the time .... the stones still try performing live, only to let down audiences who paid $200/ticket

5 -
beatles 1967 (drugs huh?)
http://www.webwiseforradio.com/site_...SGT_PEPPER.jpg
rolling stones 1967 (what were you saying about faces on album covers?)
http://www.wetstudios.com/rental_boa...gs_flowers.jpg

6 - the beatles wrote less songs about rejection, sorrow, and all that bull**** because people actually liked them... so instead they wrote songs about love

7 - the beatles were able to release amazing music of MANY genres, while the stones rarely deviated from the same path

8 - the beatles actually know what a metaphor is.... and how to use them

9 - you an *******! (you asked for someone to insult you... thought i could lend a helping hand)

10 - what kind of tool would say he snorted his fathers ashes (to sound cool) and then have to admit he was lying (to regain popularity)....super cool!

ps i also like the stones.... just hope i helped further STUs point that none of your comments even made realistic points of arguement about which band is "better"

03-19-2008, 05:15 PM	#11 (permalink)
joyboyo53 down the rabbit hole Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: the mountain called monkey Posts: 764	since irrelevance is key in these rankings.... 10 reasons why the beatles ARE better than the rolling stones 1 - john lennon is super cool 2 - so is paul & george 3 - who is prettier now? http://www.usounds.com/wp/wp-content...thrichards.jpg http://www.facade.com/celebrity/phot..._McCartney.jpg 4 - the beatles stopped performing because they didnt need to advertise their albums (the initial reason for touring) any further and wanted to spend more time making studio albums that were revolutionary at the time .... the stones still try performing live, only to let down audiences who paid $200/ticket 5 - beatles 1967 (drugs huh?) http://www.webwiseforradio.com/site_...SGT_PEPPER.jpg rolling stones 1967 (what were you saying about faces on album covers?) http://www.wetstudios.com/rental_boa...gs_flowers.jpg 6 - the beatles wrote less songs about rejection, sorrow, and all that bull** because people actually liked them... so instead they wrote songs about love 7 - the beatles were able to release amazing music of MANY genres, while the stones rarely deviated from the same path 8 - the beatles actually know what a metaphor is.... and how to use them 9 - you an *****! (you asked for someone to insult you... thought i could lend a helping hand) 10 - what kind of tool would say he snorted his fathers ashes (to sound cool) and then have to admit he was lying (to regain popularity)....super cool! ps i also like the stones.... just hope i helped further STUs point that none of your comments even made realistic points of arguement about which band is "better"