10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-27-2005, 07:21 PM   #11 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enfilade
Allow me to rephrase:

The Rolling Stones were and will always be, Materialistic, Self-centred, rock-****s, who let their undeserved fame go straight to their heads and believe themselves to be semi-gods. Concieted? mais oui.

EDIT - As I said earlier this is opinion so dont get defensive, because I'm not trying to be arguementative I'm just stating my opinion as were you. I dont think you were any less harsh.
I`m not getting defensive , I think the Rolling Stones have been crap since 1975. I just think they were better than the Beatles at the time.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.