10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-03-2012, 12:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Buzz Killjoy
 
BastardofYoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
Beatles were more original and innovative. Blues and blues-Rock are two of my favorite types of music, so you'd think I'd choose the stones but I definitely gotta go with the Beatles. Neither band Was very innovative when they first got started, but with time I think the Beatles definitey surpassed the stones in terms of innovativeness and originality.
This.

Plus Beatles continued to put out great records til the end, while the Stones...well, have not.
__________________
last.fm

‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.
BastardofYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.