10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-06-2011, 12:01 PM   #11 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
Really the Stones were ahead of the game comparing some firsts to the Beatles. The Stones were the first band to have a sitar recorded on an album and the first band to write all the tracks on an album.
Wrong.

Sitar in popular music - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Beatles (Norwegian Wood) did it before The Rolling Stones. Not only that but Brian Jones taught himself to play sitar after having visited George Harrison.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.