10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-14-2011, 06:57 PM   #10 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Down View Post
Really? I know that having a career as long as the Stones have had means that there will be some low points along the way, but I don't think their successes are outweighed by failure. Certainly not in terms of albums.
Exactly. You don't gross the most money on a tour of all time for being unsuccessful.

Beatles to me lack in certain elements, by means of music development. For example The Rolling Stones really incorporated a number of genres to make their music have such a signature style that continued to change. Using blues rock and so on.
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.