10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)

Palatable Vera · 02-20-2011, 04:52 PM

I could write books about why I think the Stones are better, but it probably isn't worth it seeing as someone could write an equably tangible argument about the Beatles.

There is something I don't understand, though. Critics rack off on the Stones because they became rather trendy after Goats Head Soup, but they seem to forget that the Beatles were rather trendy throughout their entire career. And at least the Stones could make an interesting album in the 70's even after shooting heroine into their eyeballs while the Beatles members' solo projects got progressively bland throughout the years. Like Wings. What the hell happened to that?

02-20-2011, 04:52 PM	#11 (permalink)
Palatable Vera Quad? Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 125	I could write books about why I think the Stones are better, but it probably isn't worth it seeing as someone could write an equably tangible argument about the Beatles. There is something I don't understand, though. Critics rack off on the Stones because they became rather trendy after Goats Head Soup, but they seem to forget that the Beatles were rather trendy throughout their entire career. And at least the Stones could make an interesting album in the 70's even after shooting heroine into their eyeballs while the Beatles members' solo projects got progressively bland throughout the years. Like Wings. What the hell happened to that? __________________ http://www.last.fm/user/PalatableVera