Originally Posted by dreadnought (Post 1237893)

Can't find any memorable videos by the Stones.

Originally Posted by therocker (Post 1238188)

I can't find any reason ! Conclusion, the Beatles were and have always been better !

See you

Originally Posted by therocker (Post 1238188)

I can't find any reason ! Conclusion, the Beatles were and have always been better !

See you

Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier (Post 1238193)

Oh dear, that will get the Jagger defenders out of their mothballs.

Originally Posted by Bluffley (Post 1213317)

I WISH I COULD FIND THE POST OF THAT IDIOT WHO SAID THAT THE BEATLES WERE THE WORST BAND THAT EVER BECAME FAMOUS ! TALK ABOUT WADING DEEP IN BULL#### . YOUR SMACK A## DOESN'T KNOW SH## FROM APPLE BUTTER FOR SURE. YOU ARE PROBABLY SOME HIP-HOP LOVING PUNK THAT KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT REAL MUSIC. YOU ARE EITHER IN SERIOUS DENIAL OR STUPID BEYOND BELIEF. SO I GUESS THE FOLLOWING
BANDS (TO NAME A FEW) ARE ALL BETTER. The SEX PISTOLS,The MONKEES
and The GO GO'S JUST TO NAME A VERY ,VERY FEW.:finger:

Originally Posted by therocker (Post 1238188)

I can't find any reason ! Conclusion, the Beatles were and have always been better !

See you

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 1238512)

I can't find any reason what he said would make Jagger defenders will get out of their mothballs ! Conclusion, Jagger defenders don't give a poopy !

See you .

Originally Posted by Rock N' Roll Clown (Post 1238682)

Yes, exactly, there's the difference between Stones' and Beatles' defenders. Beatles's defenders protect their band furiously like Bluffley, and we, Stones' defenders don't give much ****.

And as for the thread's main idea, all the 10 reasons that you've mentioned are perfectly incorrect, except that Mick Jagger is the greatest conman of all time, in my opinion he is second only to Gary Glitter, but still none of the Beatles can compare to him thankfully. In fact, The Beatles were the most marketable looking rock band of their era. However, you can't just mention 10 facts and conclude that one artist is better than another. As a passionate Stones fan, I admit that Beatles are way better and influential musically. On the other hand, The Stones are A rock band. They are the prototype of an average rock band that played the blues, after dumping their covers and just got lucky, they are way more charismatic and cooler than the Hollies. The longevity is an important factor too and it also pulls in millions of $ every year, but still I can't say that they are better. #1 Beatles, and very close #2 Stones, that's how I see it.

Originally Posted by Bluffley (Post 1213317)

YOUR SMACK A## DOESN'T KNOW SH## FROM APPLE BUTTER FOR SURE.