Allow me to rephrase:

The Rolling Stones were and will always be, Materialistic, Self-centred, rock-****s, who let their undeserved fame go straight to their heads and believe themselves to be semi-gods. Concieted? mais oui.

EDIT - As I said earlier this is opinion so dont get defensive, because I'm not trying to be arguementative I'm just stating my opinion as were you. I dont think you were any less harsh.

I`m not getting defensive , I think the Rolling Stones have been crap since 1975. I just think they were better than the Beatles at the time.

Stones are more badass, pure and simple.

This is extremely off topic, but notice in the picture of the Beatles that John Lennon, and Paul Mcartney are the only ones looking into the camera, and they are the only existing members..............spooky

John Lennon didn`t die?

John Lennon is dead, along with George Harrison.

Ringo Starr and Paul McCartney are still alive

The real reason why the Stones were better was because, in their prime (Beggars Banquet through It's Only Rock and Roll, I'd say) they wrote fucking great blues and country-influenced rock, while The Beatles mainly did sometimes boring, drippy "experimental", "psychadelic" stuff that can be pretty tough to sit through unless you're in the mood (which pretty much means you have to be high). Their reputation definately precedes them.

my bad.........lol

ive now seen it all. somebody who didnt know lennon was dead lol.

no ****ing way. i wouldve never guessed