10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (rock, quote)

Davey Moore · 04-07-2008, 06:52 PM

In actuality, I really dig The Rolling Stones, I'm just a rabid Beatlemaniac. The Rolling Stones are just great, pure straight up rock. Mick Jagger has one of those unique voices you instantly recognize.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 04-07-2008, 06:54 PM

And I happen to think Revolver is a very good album.

This thread seems to have done a 180 turn.

megajosh2 · 04-11-2008, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Oh now you're dissing Bjork. You're just WANTING to pick a fight with me now don't ya?.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill

No worse than Led Zeppelin having threesomes with sharks and underage groupies.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

Now compare that to...

Stones 11 : 0 Beatles

This thread is so ****ing rediculous... I CAN'T KEEP AWAY.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 04-11-2008, 11:44 PM

*R i diculous

12 : 0

provorocker · 04-12-2008, 05:17 AM

I actually like the Beatles more... stone me if you'd like. I'll have to work on a list of why they are better!

polka_tulk · 04-12-2008, 11:38 PM

saying that the stones were better than the beatles (or vice versa) in my humble opinion is a little like saying an elephant is better than a tiger.

and no i'm not going to explain that!

sleepy jack · 04-12-2008, 11:45 PM

But Tigers are way cooler than Elephants. Why don't we compare Elephants and Ant Eaters instead.

polka_tulk · 04-12-2008, 11:54 PM

How can you compare a species of the suborder Vermilingua with a species of the order Proboscidea?

Let just say the tiger and elephant are both cool in their own special way and leave it there.

sleepy jack · 04-12-2008, 11:55 PM

I know but c'mon if you had to have a pet a tiger would so be better. The ladies don't want you if you ride around on an elephant but a tiger? That's just too rad.

ProggyMan · 04-12-2008, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill

But Tigers are way cooler than Elephants. Why don't we compare Elephants and Ant Eaters instead.

Ant eaters rock! Elephants are mediocre.

04-07-2008, 06:52 PM	#151 (permalink)
Davey Moore The Great Disappearer Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: URI Campus and Coventry, both in RI Posts: 462	In actuality, I really dig The Rolling Stones, I'm just a rabid Beatlemaniac. The Rolling Stones are just great, pure straight up rock. Mick Jagger has one of those unique voices you instantly recognize. __________________ The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over.

04-07-2008, 06:54 PM	#152 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	And I happen to think Revolver is a very good album. This thread seems to have done a 180 turn. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

04-11-2008, 11:44 PM	#154 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	R i diculous 12 : 0 __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.*

04-12-2008, 05:17 AM	#155 (permalink)
provorocker Groupie Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 18	I actually like the Beatles more... stone me if you'd like. I'll have to work on a list of why they are better!

04-12-2008, 11:38 PM	#156 (permalink)
polka_tulk Groupie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ohio, USA Posts: 25	saying that the stones were better than the beatles (or vice versa) in my humble opinion is a little like saying an elephant is better than a tiger. and no i'm not going to explain that!

04-12-2008, 11:54 PM	#158 (permalink)
polka_tulk Groupie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ohio, USA Posts: 25	How can you compare a species of the suborder Vermilingua with a species of the order Proboscidea? Let just say the tiger and elephant are both cool in their own special way and leave it there.