The Beatles made trends, they didn't follow them: The Beatles were real, uh, trendsetters.

The Beatles were more diverse: They've dabbled in quite a variety of stuff. The Stones...Haven't. Not to say they quite deserve the 'blues cover band' comment I saw somewhere, but they stick to what they're good at.

RS 1: So...
RS 2: Listen to the riff in She Said She Said and then tell me the Beatles didn't have good riffs.
RS 3: Lol.

B 1: Jagger sang about what he knew, which was drugs, sex and booze. Nothing wrong with that.

Taxman has like the most basic riff ever, and I'd take it over any Stones riff any day of the week.

Abbey Road and Revolver probably have the best Beatles riffs.

Sorry kid but mick aint the best front man in the world, not even close. Try listening to some deep durple, Led zeppelin and the firm, **** Plant alone can out sing him in his sleep.

Frontman , not singer

Robert Plant has one of the most grating voices on the planet.

He's a way better singer. That's like comparing Dave Bryson to Keith Richards.

The Firm? :laughing:

Even this Jimmy Page fan has his limits.

Plant is an amazing vocalist. Don't confuse powerful with grating.

I could easly name drop artists you listen to, but having done that god knows how many times I see no point in doing it again.

If I wanted annoying wailing I'll listen to Bjork.

Oh now you're dissing Bjork. You're just WANTING to pick a fight with me now don't ya?. :bringit: