|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: The Most Influential Rock Artist | |||
The Rolling Stones | 12 | 3.74% | |
The Beatles | 152 | 47.35% | |
The Who | 12 | 3.74% | |
Led Zeppelin | 28 | 8.72% | |
The Kinks | 4 | 1.25% | |
Bob Dylan | 41 | 12.77% | |
Jim Hendrix | 37 | 11.53% | |
The Velvet Underground | 35 | 10.90% | |
Voters: 321. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-07-2011, 07:15 AM | #353 (permalink) |
The Great Disappearer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: URI Campus and Coventry, both in RI
Posts: 462
|
Bob Dylan for sure. He expanded subject matter, he was the one who told John Lennon that he should stop it with all the love songs and try and push it. He was there in New York when the folk scene was really blooming, and conquered it, hanging with Allen Ginsberg and all the poets. Bob Dylan is without a doubt the most influential artist on that list. I say that with confidence, because everyone who voted Beatles actually voted for a combination of Bob Dylan and The Beach Boys. And I'm saying that from the perspective of someone who has consumed the Beatles catalog. I mean, their like my favorite band, but it's true.
__________________
The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. |
04-07-2011, 07:19 AM | #354 (permalink) |
The Great Disappearer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: URI Campus and Coventry, both in RI
Posts: 462
|
The Velvet Underground are much more radical than Hendrix, and had a big impact on the proto-punk scene, namely inspiring bands like The Stooges, who are probably the fathers of punk rock. They also had a big impact on early people like David Bowie, Eno, and others. The reason Hendrix isn't as influential to me is because he was such an anomaly, he played this crazy alien-rock tinged with psychedelic and it all branched from how great a guitar player he was. Hendrix was all alone and on his own level, and what other bands really got there? Few. But still The Velvet Underground pushed more artistic boundaries, in my mind.
__________________
The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. |
04-07-2011, 09:36 PM | #355 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Cliff Richard?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2011, 10:28 PM | #356 (permalink) | ||
Certified H00d Classic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
|
I win.
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020 Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-09-2011, 10:44 PM | #358 (permalink) |
Quad?
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 125
|
I never really considered the Beatles influential. I know that sounds completely daft, but I've never seen them as anything else but just another 60's pop band. I'm sure that you guys could come up with reasons why they were, but it seems more like they were the ones getting inspired, not inspiring anyone else. Like... Sgt Pepper's sounds a lot like Pet Sounds. But that's just one example. And what was that thing about the Beatles "being the first artist to take risks"? I've heard that thrown around before, but what about that Bruce Haack guy? Harry Partch? Perhaps the Beatles popularized these certain musical quirks, which is where they get this "influential" stamp from, but they weren't really all that original.
Eh. That probably doesn't make sense. It's late and my thoughts are a bit disjointed. Feel free to prove me wrong. :/
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/PalatableVera |
|