Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/)
-   -   The Beatles (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/33615-beatles.html)

NGPercussion 07-10-2011 01:59 PM

I agree on that. ^ Though there are gems in all four of the Beatles' solo work.

As a good Beatles album for a beginner, I'd just pick up a random compilation.

TheNiceGuy 07-12-2011 02:43 AM

Thanks for the suggestions everyone. If you want to know I'll be starting off with Rubber Soul.

Howard the Duck 07-12-2011 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNiceGuy (Post 1083654)
Thanks for the suggestions everyone. If you want to know I'll be starting off with Rubber Soul.

a most tres excellente choice

Aimbot 08-23-2011 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNiceGuy (Post 1083654)
Thanks for the suggestions everyone. If you want to know I'll be starting off with Rubber Soul.

Rubber Soul is good, not their best but even The Beatles' mediocre albums are phenomenal. Listen to Abbey Road next, that is their best in my opinion.

Neapolitan 08-23-2011 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNiceGuy (Post 1081205)
What do you guys reckon is the best album to start someone off with from The Beatles?

I would start off with a movie like "A Hard Days Night" then watch a doc like The Complete Beatles or The Beatles Anthology.

blastingas10 10-26-2011 04:34 AM

Some people think that the beatles were nothing special, just a mediocre pop band. I don't see how anyone can think that.

TheNiceGuy 10-28-2011 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blastingas10 (Post 1113719)
Some people think that the beatles were nothing special, just a mediocre pop band. I don't see how anyone can think that.

I used to think that a while back.... God I was an idiot.... ;)

blastingas10 10-28-2011 03:02 AM

Ive been defending them for a while now, on another thread. Theyve been called "formulaic pop band". That's so false. They were always changing and experimenting and they were so innovative in so many ways. They DID NOT stick to the same formula that got them their success in the beginning.

TheNiceGuy 10-28-2011 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blastingas10 (Post 1114297)
Ive been defending them for a while now, on another thread. Theyve been called "formulaic pop band". That's so false. They were always changing and experimenting and they were so innovative in so many ways. They DID NOT stick to the same formula that got them their success in the beginning.

That's true. Certainly their greatest strength was being able to combine accessible pop/rock to their more arty/experimental side in a perfect balance. And like you said they were constantly adapting and changing to keep themselves on the musical cutting edge.

blastingas10 10-28-2011 04:25 PM

Traditions do not appear out of thin air, they reflect certain natural tendencies in people's minds, and totally discarding traditional forms in favour of something previously unheard before is much like somebody discarding the traditional way of walking down the street in favour of, say, crawling on all fours - just because this makes him different from the regular "sheep herd".

They could take traditional forms and imbue them with new content, as well as pour old content into new forms.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.