|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who deserves the title "The King of Rock and Roll"? | |||
Elvis Presley | 103 | 41.53% | |
Chuck Berry | 75 | 30.24% | |
Little Richard | 14 | 5.65% | |
Neither | 56 | 22.58% | |
Voters: 248. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-07-2011, 07:43 AM | #221 (permalink) | |
Justifiable Idiocracy
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
Im sure Rock would have progressed without Hendrix. It just would have just been years behind. |
|
04-07-2011, 07:45 AM | #222 (permalink) | ||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
I feel like such a nubcake for asking this but what did Hendrix really contribute to rock as a whole? His solos were pretty awesome but are you trying to say he created the whole idea of doing solos?
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
||
04-07-2011, 07:58 AM | #223 (permalink) | |
The Great Disappearer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: URI Campus and Coventry, both in RI
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
I mean honestly, the equation for influence is how many bands sound like Hendrix or spawned off of his sound, or how many people were inspired to form bands because of him? The only category that Hendrix can claim is the latter, but inspiring people to play guitar isn't as big of an influence as sound, in my mind at least.
__________________
The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. |
|
04-07-2011, 07:59 AM | #224 (permalink) | |
Justifiable Idiocracy
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2011, 08:06 AM | #225 (permalink) |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
it's more of influencing how guitars sound in rock, not really rock in general
and as for the King, the King died on his throne (presumably the toilet bowl) - Public Enemy paraphrased |
04-07-2011, 08:09 AM | #226 (permalink) | |
The Great Disappearer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: URI Campus and Coventry, both in RI
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
__________________
The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. |
|
04-07-2011, 08:45 AM | #227 (permalink) | |
Justifiable Idiocracy
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
How do you become one of Rocks top artists of all time without influencing others around you? |
|
04-07-2011, 09:06 AM | #228 (permalink) | |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
Quote:
he may have changed the way guitars sound or how guitarists play, but not much on the style of rock, compared to, say, The Beatless and The Stoned and The Beards and The Bitch Boys |
|
04-07-2011, 09:09 AM | #229 (permalink) | ||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
Yes, he was great and unique at the time and yes he inspired some people to pick up a guitar and try to learn to do what he does but I don't being one of Rock's top artist has to do with his unique style at the time not because he influenced so many other bands to do what they do.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
||
04-07-2011, 09:25 AM | #230 (permalink) | |
Justifiable Idiocracy
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
I do agree with the fact the Beatles had more influence but anybody with any music knowledge at all knows that. As far as the total number of bands he did influence..how is there an accurate way to speculate on that? There are many though that have a distinct sound or style that screams Hendrix when they play. Oh and Spy's are pansies imo Besides with the exception of Davey you and D.J are just trollin but its cool. I dont get bent out of shape about lil stuff. I stand by Hendrix and Yes im probaly a hopeless fan boy. Thats what it is to truly be a fan of something. Im not however losing my sense of reasoning and logic. Of course the Beatles had more influence than Hendrix did but the initial debate was Elvis being crowned the king. So in comparison other than his mass popularity..no doubt cause of the marketing aspect of things and time of which he came about. I wouldnt place him over Hendrix for the King of Rock title. He was an image not so much an artist or experimenter or lyricist.
__________________
<DoctorSoft>: You know life is good when you take Viagra to jack off lol Amongst Mb's Most Hated (Smiley Face)
Last edited by Bloozcrooz; 04-07-2011 at 10:15 AM. |
|
|