|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: How good are the Who? | |||
Greatest Ever! | 15 | 13.27% | |
One of the Best Ever! | 64 | 56.64% | |
Pretty Good. | 20 | 17.70% | |
Ok. | 11 | 9.73% | |
Terrible. | 3 | 2.65% | |
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-30-2012, 05:17 PM | #191 (permalink) | ||
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Power Metal Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History |
||
11-30-2012, 06:24 PM | #194 (permalink) | |||
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
Quote:
So just because a Who song is famous doesn't mean I'll like it. I feel annoyed by "Who Are You" because of its owl-like "Who who who who" (which they repeat again and again) and I dislike the melody and most of the instrumentals. The very first time I heard that song in the '90s, I disliked it. However, the first time I heard "You Better You Bet," it moved me. I haven't heard all their lesser known songs, so it is possible that some songs I might like are hidden in their repertoire. However, most of their songs I've heard are ones I dislike, such as... "New Song" "Love is Coming Down" (Bluck) "Bargain" "The Real Me" "Doctor Doctor" "How Many Friends" "Cut My Hair" "Trick of the Light" "It's Not Enough" "Doctor Jimmy" "I Can't Explain" "Love Ain't For keeping" "Song is Over" "Dogs" "Heaven and Hell" "The Relay" "Bell Boy" "Real Good Looking Boy" "The Quiet One" etc. I may just be having a bad day...but I think it is more likely that I simply don't like the style of most Who songs. "Won't Get Fooled Again" almost didn't make it onto my "Like" list, too. I do kind of like "Pure and Easy" because it's pretty. Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde was interesting. I am now going to listen to "You Better You Bet" to purge the other songs from my mind: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir2rFb_ghn0 Ahh! That's better.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by VEGANGELICA; 11-30-2012 at 07:04 PM. |
|||
06-21-2013, 09:12 AM | #195 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Sunderland
Posts: 9
|
The Who will never be the same as they were, but my friend went to see them last night and said that they were still absolutely class.. All you can actually think of is the golden olden days really... but Daltrey still has got it :-)
|
06-30-2013, 12:58 PM | #196 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 299
|
Quote:
I've never understood all the hype around the Who. Live at Leeds is a classic showcase of live rock, and Tommy is a nice album and impressive for its ambition, but beyond that they never reached me much. A good band, but one of the best? Somebody explain it to me! Maybe I'll listen through all the albums I have again. It has been a while, maybe I'll like them more now. |
|
06-30-2013, 02:33 PM | #197 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hampshire, England
Posts: 434
|
The Who's albums tended to be pressed okay, but by their own admission were badly recorded. Polydor were one of the better pressers. Never was there a greater contrast between performance and recording, than with Quadrophenia, because the original vinyl sounded terrible. Every cloud has its silver lining and you can hear someone shout 'Pete!' Also, turn it up and John Entwistle's bass playing is phenomenal.
I cannot explain what makes The Who great to me, but I'll have a go. First is the power and the impact. They are not a conventional heavy rock band, yet tracks like Baba O'Riley and Doctor Jimmy make the heavy bands sound like pop music. When I see footage of The Who at hippy festivals in the late sixties/ early seventies, they blow everyone away. Second is The Who are not a conventional progressive rock band, but the rock operas (Tommy and Quadrophenia) match Yes and ELP for ambition, experimentation and musicianship. Admittedly The Who are inconsistent, but they have strong songwriting. Townshend has said that 'progressive' is a derogatory term, which mystifies me. Third, the hit singles are catchy and melodic, but they have memorable lyrics and tremendous energy, like I Can See for Miles. They also have an Englishness, based on adolescence, suburbia and imagery, which I am suprised has not alienated Americans (or perhaps it has!). Fourth, The Who have a great singer in Roger Daltrey. I cannot think of many performances that better his on Love Reign O'er Me from Quadrophenia. Nevertheless, Daltrey himself has said that the success of The Who was due to 'chemistry' and he is right. Fifth is the unidentifiable element. I do not like Pete Townshend very much when I see, hear or read interviews with him, because he seems conceited. I remember mods from my childhood, but I do not relate to them as he does. Despite this, I cannot help loving The Who. There is little cliche with The Who: no denim and leather, no fantasy landscapes, no whining self-pitying lyrics, few keyboard solos, and plenty of chords, but not many guitar solos (and I'm a Black Sabbath and Yes fan). Like The Rolling Stones, The Kinks and Led Zeppelin, The Who transcend everything because they have a timeless quality.
__________________
My Journal: Rabbiting On |
07-21-2013, 10:22 AM | #199 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
were incredibly original.
__________________
link removed by mod, please read our rules regarding signature links. |
|
07-21-2013, 12:05 PM | #200 (permalink) | ||
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Power Metal Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History |
||
|