|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,156
|
![]()
I wouldn't consider them prog though they did have some proggy material, i certainly wouldn't consider them glam though i can hear a little Bowie influence in some of their work... I'd say overall they were just a rock n roll band, plain and simple.... Some however would go as far as to call them metal or proto metal, and i see that as a possibility.... Their influence on a lot of metal bands is pretty overlooked.
A lot of people label them AOR or Album Oriented Rock... Which is also what Journey, Foreigner and REO Speedwagon are considered to be... Which is a big insult to BoC. I don't consider them AOR though, AOR bands aren't badass enough to have Patti Smith write songs for them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 391
|
![]() Quote:
actaully ths I did not know, that makes it quite interesting.... i thougth it was cleer hwo they had that crooked cross logo thing incorporated into every album cover.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|