explosions-in-my-pants

dude you don't even like the stones.. haha

i have taste.. but my taste i will admit isn't liked much..

Urban Hat€monger ?

I don`t think your taste is that bad , granted I remember you making me listen to that godawful dragonforce song & a few suspect 80s bands , but other than that I can think of much worse things to listen to than what you do.

And why do you keep saying I don`t like the Stones

__________________

TheBig3

With all the name changes around here, I don't really know who sittingbehindyou, madeinNY, and sabrinah became, but whoever you are (its really just a conglomerate of bullet posting lounge lizards to me) I have to ask why some of those things matter at all? I mean I know that theres a large peice of the global population that dislikes things for stupid reasons, but their old? And you don't like a documentry that Jagger was focused on?

What do either of those things have to do with their music? The other things you listed were in fact subjective points that I'll entertain (though it might be nice to go into why their annoying.) but seeing as this looks like the most work you've put into a post recently, I won't ask too much.

Am I also out of line thinking that if you didn't like a band, then just don't post in that thread rather than post negitivly? Or if you're going to post negitivly, at least throw them a bone in some manner by mentioning one thing you like?

This isn't me attempting to decree rules, im literally asking how you guys feel about that.

__________________
I've moved to a new address

explosions-in-my-pants

cause you come off as a big Stones fan... when in fact your not hehe..I just don't like there sound, and i don't like the band members as people.. or as the people that are shown to the media... and in the doc he couldn't sing for ****.. it was so funny.

one thing i like about them.. they still have the guts to keep going.
I respect them only because other great bands to come after words were inspired by them, and very much influenced by them.. other then that theres nothing.

TheBig3

So it doesn't seem impressive to you that they turned out a pretty decent album this past year?

__________________
I've moved to a new address

right-track

Something that hasn't been mentioned yet is the quality of Jagger/Richards songwriting, especially in the early days.
It seems it's always overlooked.

crow t robot

The stones are my favorite band and probably always will be. It's that raw, earthy quality..everything just comes from the heart! I can't really put into words what I like about them but if I was on a desert island and could listen to only one band, it would most definitely be the rolling stones

__________________
PS - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated...

explosions-in-my-pants

non of there albums caught my ears attention.. there sound bugs me.. mick jaggers voice bugs me. Song writing is alright.. but still the song isn't great is there isn't a voice to back it up.. much like..

working class hero - john lennon..

that there is a great song.. the writing is amazing.. but john lennons voice just doesn't cut it for me.. he is a great singer just not in that song. and to me thats what the stones are like all of the time.

TheBig3

Did you miss the whole "Not compared with the beatles element of this thread." WTF do I have to do here, threaten grandmothers lives? Come on now.

__________________
I've moved to a new address

bungalow

This is a thread about the Stones....what did you expect?
They will always and forever be compared to the Beatles. I realize that it bothers you though, when we don't comply to every rule that you lay out in your original post.