Keith Moon vs. Neil Peart (instrumental, metal, rock, single)

Laces Out Dan! · 07-10-2006, 06:59 PM

Peart > > > > > > Moon

boo boo · 07-10-2006, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

Hmmmm now who looks like they`re kicking the most ass here?

Why do you always confuse music with image?... Would you honestly like a musician more because of his/her image?

boo boo · 07-10-2006, 07:55 PM

Anyway i voted for Peart.... Because there's no way Moon is better.

breakingbenfan13 · 07-10-2006, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Why do you always confuse music with image?... Would you honestly like a musician more because of their image?

Thats exactly what I was saying.

tdoc210 · 07-10-2006, 08:03 PM

mmm i change to peart

beat yr own KID · 07-10-2006, 09:10 PM

I didn't really read this thread but I'm sure it's full of stupid. When the question is asked "who's better" you look at who is more technical, has better songs, who's more creative, and all that jazz. With that being said, ANYONE who does not pick neil has either never heard rush play, seen them live, or are just plain retarded. Rush in general own most bands. They make really creative sounding and sometimes catchy songs. They have incredible lyrics in which Piert writes all of so he's got that going for him too. Last but not lest, Piert did a 20 minute drum solo when I saw them. Now you're thinking wow that would get boring. No. Not at all. In fact it was probably the most impressive thing I have ever seen ever. His set is so huge they have to lock him in it and he spun upside in mid solo for ****s sake.

boo boo · 07-10-2006, 09:14 PM

True.... Better can be either subjective or objective depending on the topic... It could be subjective if it involves two bands and who makes better music, which is just opinion... But when it involves single musicians and their instrumental talents, than facts can be taken into consideration... And the question here is who's the better drummer, not which drummer is in the better band or which drummer is in a band that you like more... Objectively, Neil Peart is the more talented of the two, there's no denying that, and to deny that would be a foolish thing.

breakingbenfan13 · 07-10-2006, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beat yr own KID

I didn't really read this thread but I'm sure it's full of stupid. When the question is asked "who's better" you look at who is more technical, has better songs, who's more creative, and all that jazz. With that being said, ANYONE who does not pick neil has either never heard rush play, seen them live, or are just plain retarded. Rush in general own most bands. They make really creative sounding and sometimes catchy songs. They have incredible lyrics in which Piert writes all of so he's got that going for him too. Last but not lest, Piert did a 20 minute drum solo when I saw them. Now you're thinking wow that would get boring. No. Not at all. In fact it was probably the most impressive thing I have ever seen ever. His set is so huge they have to lock him in it and he spun upside in mid solo for ****s sake.

Yeah im not a big rush fan but you can't deny his skill (although im more into the metal drumming than percussion), alot of people are picking Keith because he looks cool when hes playing, which has nothing to do with being good...

BTW how come all the post i visit end up in my subscribed threads? i have about 100 new emails of people replying to thread iv visited...

sleepy jack · 07-10-2006, 09:21 PM

Hmmmm now who looks like they`re kicking the most ass here?

*votes for peart*

boo boo · 07-10-2006, 09:22 PM

View Poll Results: WHo is Better Keith Moon or Neil Peart?
Keith Moon	91	51.12%
Neil Peart	87	48.88%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll

07-10-2006, 06:59 PM	#81 (permalink)
Laces Out Dan! I love Puck Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: British Columbia Posts: 4,614	Peart > > > > > > Moon __________________ We are entirely smooth, We admit to the truth, We are the best at what we do.

07-10-2006, 08:03 PM	#85 (permalink)
tdoc210 ashes against the grain Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: new hampsha Posts: 2,617	mmm i change to peart __________________ We went back there and they had come and hacked off every inoculated arm. There they were in a pile. A pile of little arms. And I remember... I... I... I cried. I wept like some grandmother. I wanted to tear my teeth out. I didn't know what I wanted to do. And I want to remember it. I never want to forget it. I never want to forget. And then I realized... like I was shot... like I was shot with a diamond... a diamond bullet right through my forehead. And I thought: My God... the genius of that.

07-10-2006, 09:10 PM	#86 (permalink)
beat yr own KID Music Addict Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Fort Washington MD Posts: 923	I didn't really read this thread but I'm sure it's full of stupid. When the question is asked "who's better" you look at who is more technical, has better songs, who's more creative, and all that jazz. With that being said, ANYONE who does not pick neil has either never heard rush play, seen them live, or are just plain retarded. Rush in general own most bands. They make really creative sounding and sometimes catchy songs. They have incredible lyrics in which Piert writes all of so he's got that going for him too. Last but not lest, Piert did a 20 minute drum solo when I saw them. Now you're thinking wow that would get boring. No. Not at all. In fact it was probably the most impressive thing I have ever seen ever. His set is so huge they have to lock him in it and he spun upside in mid solo for ****s sake. __________________ I was dead. This was hell. There were no demons, no hellfire or brimstone, just a deep, complete feeling of darkness and hopelessness. This was the never-ending void. Not at all how I had imagined it, but worse than I thought that it could have been.