|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#51 (permalink) |
Supernatural anaesthetist
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
|
![]()
How's this for a comparisation:
Queen vs. Electric Light Orchestra (for the musical approach) or Queen vs. David Bowie (for the theatricality). Discuss.
__________________
- More is more -
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 (permalink) | |
Registered Jimmy Rustler
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,364
|
![]() Quote:
Queen Vs King Crimson
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew* *Always Checks Credentials Crew* *nba > nfl crew* *Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew* |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
![]()
King Crimson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. Queen
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 (permalink) |
Living under the bridge
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 317
|
![]()
Not a great comparison as King Crimson were very much Prog, compared to Queen who are more Hard glammy rock with a lot of other element thrown in, including a little Prog. But this was only in their early days, most of their proggy influences were gone by about the late 70's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 (permalink) | |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 (permalink) |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
![]()
I`d classify most of their earlier stuff as pomp rock and a song like "Bohemian Rhapsody" is a great example of this. Queen did this song in just 5 to 6 mins, wheras a group like Yes probably would`ve stretched it out for around 20 mins!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|