|
Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
View Poll Results: Which metal is better: thrash or doom? | |||
thrash metal |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 53.85% |
doom metal |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 46.15% |
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 187
|
![]()
For me it's doom metal all the way.
I always found thrash metal to be a bit generic and overrated as a subgenre of metal, although I dig some stuff. And doom metal is totally underrated and overlooked and it derserves much more attention from metal fans. What you say? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
|
![]()
I don't listen to any doom metal except Cathedral, so it's gonna have to be thrash.
I agree thrash is overrated and usually generic, but I can't exactly say that doom metal bands tend to light my fire either. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
![]()
Doom because I smoke weed.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
![]()
This
But good thrash gives me the weed creepies like crazy and that’s a good thing
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Do good.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 2,065
|
![]()
I love both genres, but I have to go doom. It’s more flexible, and right now there are SO many options for doom albums. They can easily fuse with other genres for something new and exciting. I love thrash, but it doesn’t really do that well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) |
Do good.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 2,065
|
![]()
Thanks.
From blackened doom to funeral doom to sludge metal to drone metal to stoner to whatever Om is... doom can go in a million different directions, and each of those directions has something interesting and groundbreaking. Thrash, while enjoyable, doesn't do that. Thrash is thrash. Sure, it can work in a little black metal, a little death metal, or maybe hardcore punk... but the lines get blurry. At what point is thrash metal no longer thrash metal? Usually when it gets hardcore breakdowns, or screechy vocals and tremolo picking, or death metal vocals. It's narrow. Here are some examples of doom doing different things very well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
Paragraph President
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Burning Star
Posts: 837
|
![]()
I guess for me, music doesn't have to be creative to be enjoyable. As long as there's energy and a certain amount of excitement in the performance, as in the music sounds like it comes from the heart, I think it has merit. I'd take an amateurish self-released thrash album with heart over a big experimental but boring album any day.
For example, Airdash sounds a lot like Anthrax with an 80's Testament production sound, but the way they play makes it not matter at all. Plus, I see nothing to be upset about seeing as I love Anthrax and Testament. I still absolutely love this album. It's energetic and exciting, more so then many experimental metal albums I've heard: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|