New Metallica album coming out November 18, 2016 -- Hardwired..To Self-Destruct - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2016, 05:23 PM   #51 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

I do think Ulrich played some interesting things on Justice. He's pretty much the sole reason I started noticing bass drum playing in music way back. I'd never heard anything like those somewhat odd patterns on that album.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 05:25 PM   #52 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blankmind View Post
In that case, no. They never had a production that suited them. Kind of odd. The band that many people consider to be the greatest heavy metal band has never had good production.
Probably in the minority here but: I think ReLoad had perfect sound. Good bass tone and presence, colourful and meaty guitars, lots of subtle filters and effects giving various tracks their own flavour. Easily the best sounding Metallica album in my opinion and also helped by the fact that Hetfield learned to sing around the time they recorded it (and then made sure to forget how again before they recorded St. Anger).

EDIT: Forgot the drums. They sound fine too. I always liked Ulrich's strange, "wet" bass drum tone.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 05:29 PM   #53 (permalink)
Primo Celebate Sexiness
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,662
Default

I haven't heard ReLoad yet, but Load's a good album. Sure, Metallica needed work experimenting with things outside their metal works, and they clearly weren't fully ready for blues rock (if they ever will be), but they still managed to make a fun album nonetheless.
__________________
I'm a pretty nice troll if you ask me.
JGuy Grungeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 05:32 PM   #54 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MicShazam View Post
Probably in the minority here but: I think ReLoad had perfect sound. Good bass tone and presence, colourful and meaty guitars, lots of subtle filters and effects giving various tracks their own flavour. Easily the best sounding Metallica album in my opinion and also helped by the fact that Hetfield learned to sing around the time they recorded it (and then made sure to forget how again before they recorded St. Anger).

EDIT: Forgot the drums. They sound fine too. I always liked Ulrich's strange, "wet" bass drum tone.
It's been a while since I heard load. But as I recall, it had really flat production. Very compressed. And while they overcame the set back in a few songs, for the most part, it took away from the album.
Blank. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 05:33 PM   #55 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGuy Grungeman View Post
I haven't heard ReLoad yet, but Load's a good album. Sure, Metallica needed work experimenting with things outside their metal works, and they clearly weren't fully ready for blues rock (if they ever will be), but they still managed to make a fun album nonetheless.
What I like about Reload is that it sounds better than Load (to me anyway) and that it is even more fun to listen to. Once you're past the first three tracks, the album is pretty much just an unbroken string of great tunes. Slither, Carpe Diem, Attitude, Prince Charming, Where the Wild Things Are... All some of my favourite Metallica tracks and all universally forgotten by everyone it seems.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 05:34 PM   #56 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blankmind View Post
It's been a while since I heard load. But as I recall, it had really flat production. Very compressed. And while they overcame the set back in a few songs, for the most part, it took away from the album.
I'm not so sure about compression levels, but Load does sound more dark and samey that Reload. I'm not sure why, but I just get tired of Load more easily.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 05:50 PM   #57 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Terrapin_Station's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: NYC Man
Posts: 877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
I don't know what you mean "on a fine-grained" level.
What I mean is this: from bar to bar, or if you compare bar 10 to bar 14, say, you can keep things steady in terms of bpm, but let's say that you're playing a syncopated eighth note note figure across those four bars. Well in terms of what we'd call "quantization" a la electronic gear, some of those eighth notes might be ahead of perfect mathematical divisions, and some might be late.

Keeping the same bpm across a number of bars (and the whole piece) is being metronomic on a broad level--and usually that's desired, at least unless you're intentionally straying from it for some reason.

The eighth notes being quite a bit ahead or behind the beat within those bars would be an example of not being metronomic on a fine-grained level. Some of us prefer this, too, as it helps the music groove and lets it "breathe"--it doesn't sound like we've got a TR-909 playing four on the floor.
Quote:
Palmer is very tight, accurate and maybe this comes from his studying. Palmer is very profient, what he does is very rudimentary. I'm not saying he can't do the shuffle or strike the Toms at a odd time, but when he does it's exactly where it should be.
If you were to match his playing up with a perfectly quantized sequence of a transcription of what he's playing, he'd often be ahead or behind the sequencer. (As would Lars and Ringo)
Terrapin_Station is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 06:24 PM   #58 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William_the_Bloody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
Default

Metallica lost there passion over two decades ago when they became rich millionaires.

I suppose if someone tied me down and forced me to listen to it I would think it's allright, but I doubt that I will ever hear anything as good as their first three albums.

Like the other big three there time as long since come and gone, and there pretty much playing the classic rock circuit now.
William_the_Bloody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 09:04 PM   #59 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Norg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondo Bungle View Post
could someone explain to me how Lars is a "bad drummer"
well for one since like IDK 1988 he has been using the Basic of the basic Hi hat snare beat and yes I know that's the money making backbone for all songs but there comes a point were if u do it for IDK 28 years for multiple songs

u might wanna try something else
Norg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 09:13 PM   #60 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norg View Post
well for one since like IDK 1988 he has been using the Basic of the basic Hi hat snare beat and yes I know that's the money making backbone for all songs but there comes a point were if u do it for IDK 28 years for multiple songs

u might wanna try something else
Well, the snare fill, as I recall, in Sad But True is considered to be a bit of an innovation for its time. The main reason Ulrich gets so much shit is he doesn't play in time very well.
Blank. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.