|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-09-2016, 05:23 AM | #91 (permalink) | |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
|
02-09-2016, 09:06 AM | #94 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
02-09-2016, 10:34 AM | #95 (permalink) |
Because I Am, I Can!
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,128
|
Eh...well, I think back to what you said about G N' R when I defended they're still a relevant band due to the demand that they tour, make records, reunite with that classic line up. You said something to the extent that to you, that isn't necessarily relevance, it's more that people still like them or that it is ok to like them still.
So to answer your question. It isn't that I think Limp Bizkit is still relevant. They're just sought after to tour and release music because fans still want that from them. In the eyes of media however. You won't see or hear of LB being talked about. Not unless it's some e-magazine or a magazine that'd do any story on them, which wouldn't be a long list. Kerrang! has done a somewhat recent story, as did PRP and Metal Hammer I think. But that isn't relevance. So...no, LB wouldn't be relevant. |
02-24-2016, 02:35 PM | #98 (permalink) |
OQB
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Frownland
Posts: 8,831
|
Reminds me of the guitar dude from Fury Road.
__________________
Music Blog / RYM / Last.fm / Qwertyy's Journal of Music Reviews and Other Assorted Ramblings |
|