|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Best Ex-Beatle's Work? | |||
John Lennon | 8 | 40.00% | |
Paul McCartney | 3 | 15.00% | |
George Harrison | 5 | 25.00% | |
Ringo Starr | 3 | 15.00% | |
Paul McCartney and Wings | 1 | 5.00% | |
The Traveling Wilburies | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-22-2013, 08:24 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Engorged Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,536
|
Paul McCartney's RAM is the best and most consistent thing I've heard.
__________________
last.fm | my collection on RYM | vinyl instagram @allthatyouseeandhear I'd love to see your signature/links too, but the huge and obnoxious ones have caused me to block all signatures. |
07-25-2013, 08:02 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
|
Quote:
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
|
07-30-2013, 06:16 AM | #26 (permalink) | |
cooler commie than elph
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In a hole, help
Posts: 2,811
|
Quote:
The forum is called Rock & Metal.
__________________
|
|
08-06-2013, 06:43 PM | #28 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2
|
I love a lot of each solo members work. Even though John had consistantly made a lot better solo albums than Paul over the 40+ years Paul has made solo work there have been more stuff I have enjoyed so there's logic for you. And he has actually made a lot of great records, McCartney...RAM...Band On The Run.. the list goes on. George's career nosedived a bit in the mid 70s but I've looked the majority of his work. Ringo... well, I liked the self-titled album and Time Takes Time but otherwise other than the odd song his solo career is 90% dud. Sorry Ringo . Paul takes it for me for unfair majority output.
|
08-06-2013, 07:35 PM | #29 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 899
|
John got too political for me. Don't like being preached at. Paul and Ringo were a bit too light. George seemed to be about right. Not too light or too heavy. But for sheer volume, Paul wins hands down.
It seems to me that they had a synergy together that wasn't there after they broke up. I think their lack of musical sophistication told on them. Somehow together, though, they couldn't be beat. I think George Martin is largely responsible for that. |
|