|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Foo Fighters or Nirvana? | |||
Nirvana |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
106 | 66.25% |
Tie |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 9.38% |
Foo Fighters |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 24.38% |
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
The Aerosol in your Soul
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 1,546
|
![]() Quote:
Nirvana had a heavier, more raw sound. Involved lead work and riffs. Cobain had an individual, grainy, edgy voice compared to Grohl's. Their songs are distinctive from one another, musically speaking. The only similarities I can tell this far are having alternative rock qualities, with similar time lengths, and Grohl using his voice in a similar fashion sometimes. Not really though, Grohl had more of a singing, melodic voice. Foo Fighters are pretty generic. I thought it was popcorn at first. Edit: Thought I'd add a bit more description.
__________________
last.fm Last edited by Rjinn; 01-05-2014 at 10:14 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|