|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Foo Fighters or Nirvana? | |||
Nirvana |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
106 | 66.25% |
Tie |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 9.38% |
Foo Fighters |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 24.38% |
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 258
|
![]()
Overall content, as it were, Foo Fighters are better, right; Kurt wasn't Steve Vai on the guitars. Krist Novoselic wasn't Bryan Beller either. But Nirvana were more original; their melodies were richer. In my humble opinion, Nirvana were hugely better than F. Fighters. So I went with Kurt's band.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|