|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Foo Fighters or Nirvana? | |||
Nirvana | 106 | 66.25% | |
Tie | 15 | 9.38% | |
Foo Fighters | 39 | 24.38% | |
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-07-2013, 01:05 PM | #76 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
|
In all honesty, I don't find Foo Fighters to be all that bad, Dave Grohl is a stand up dude and deserves the fame he gets. And, a new Nirvana? If that were possible, a new Nirvana wouldn't come close to the influence that the original had since they were part of the rise of grunge. I don't think we can have another rise of grunge unless it totally died and everyone forgot about it.
|
11-07-2013, 03:29 PM | #78 (permalink) |
Out of Place
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: in an abstract house
Posts: 4,111
|
I think FF is good but i prefer Nirvana.
__________________
"Hey Kids you got to meet the MIGHTY PIXIES!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbRbCtIgW3A |
11-10-2013, 12:26 PM | #79 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 450
|
And why don't the Foo Fighters have integrity and honesty? Some of their songs explore some worries Grohl has ("Hey Johnny Park") or denounce people who have wronged him ("Let It Die" is almost universally agreed to be about Courtney Love). Dave is just a generally happier guy than Kurt ever was, so his songs tend to be happier. Is happier less honest? No. And to be fair, Nirvana has plenty of songs that aren't too serious about real experiences ("Drain You"), but they're looked at with a more depressing point of view.
|
|