|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Foo Fighters or Nirvana? | |||
Nirvana | 106 | 66.25% | |
Tie | 15 | 9.38% | |
Foo Fighters | 39 | 24.38% | |
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-15-2013, 05:53 AM | #61 (permalink) |
don't be no bojangles
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 496
|
Gonna have to be unpopular here and say that I actually strongly dislike both bands. I never got into them and I doubt I ever will.
Nirvana sound like a psychological experiment, whereby a sleepwalking man was transported into a studio and exposed to various guitar noises, before having his vocal reactions recorded and dispatched for profit. And every Foo Fighters song seems to follow the same pattern, whereby Grohl will repeatedly shout the chorus a little bit louder than he previously did. I once listened to Echoes, Silence, Patience & Grace on a plane and was violently ill as a result.
__________________
'Well, I'm a common working man, With a half of bitter, bread and jam, And if it pleases me, I'll put one on ya man, When the copper fades away!' - Jethro Tull |
09-16-2013, 06:15 PM | #63 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11
|
Nirvana is overrated just because it almost killed off both rock and metal, but Cobain blowing his brains out really made them a brillaint band, just as Queen got legendary when Mercury died. Stupid if you ask me, musically speaking Foo fighters by far.
|
09-16-2013, 11:46 PM | #64 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 258
|
Overall content, as it were, Foo Fighters are better, right; Kurt wasn't Steve Vai on the guitars. Krist Novoselic wasn't Bryan Beller either. But Nirvana were more original; their melodies were richer. In my humble opinion, Nirvana were hugely better than F. Fighters. So I went with Kurt's band.
|
09-26-2013, 09:18 PM | #65 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 54
|
I'll have to go with Nirvana.
I have heard a few songs from them both (just more Nirvana) and it can't be compared. Foo Fighters are alright, but Nirvana is way better. Nirvana's songs just cut deep really deep. They have some kind of emotional appeal to me, and they're well made, but I can't say the same about FF, although they do have some good songs.
__________________
"I'm sick and tired of people saying that we put out 11 albums that sound exactly the same.
In fact, we've put out 12 albums that sound exactly the same." -Angus Young |
09-26-2013, 10:35 PM | #66 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
|
|
09-27-2013, 08:03 AM | #68 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Fixed
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
09-27-2013, 08:27 AM | #70 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
As far as I'm concerned that's all Nirvana is to me is Nevermind.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
|