|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Foo Fighters or Nirvana? | |||
Nirvana | 106 | 66.25% | |
Tie | 15 | 9.38% | |
Foo Fighters | 39 | 24.38% | |
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-13-2013, 04:14 AM | #53 (permalink) | ||
My Body is a Cage.
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Down in a hole..
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hey, I can respect that. Whatever you dig, you dig. Not up to me but it is up to you and if you liked that album then rock on, buddy. |
||
07-17-2013, 04:49 AM | #54 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Definitely. I wonder what people would have thought of them if Kurt hadn't killed himself. Possibly, they would've broken up and Grohl would've founded FF or something like it and Kurt would've kept on solo or with a different band, releasing post-Nirvana stuff with declining quality as artists generally do. Nirvana would be seen as important, but perhaps a little less overrated than it is now.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
07-17-2013, 05:47 PM | #55 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 13
|
That is such an easy one! Nirvana all the way! Dave Grhoul road off of Kurt Cobain into stardom. Also Dave said that he learned his song writing from Kurt. there sound is so different. The Foo Fighters sound so commercial compared to Nirvana.
|
08-14-2013, 11:06 AM | #56 (permalink) | |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Is this how they speak in LA?
__________________
Quote:
Power Metal Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History |
|
|