Nirvana vs. Foo Fighters

Mojo · 06-23-2013, 01:16 PM

Yeah, they were a decent band. I won't knock them or anything. It's just a case of the Yawnsvilles for me now and has been since my Nirvana phase in my teens.

You never know, I may start to listen to them again one day.

**Goofle** · 06-23-2013, 01:46 PM

I still love In Utero but could easily never willingly listen to them again.

Forward To Death · 06-23-2013, 02:43 PM

Nirvana. Not really even close for me, since I've never been interested in Foo Fighters.

Nevermind is a damn good album, and In Utero is even better. Uhhh, that one album by Foo Fighters wasn't too bad I guess... Yeah, that one album.

Mojo · 06-23-2013, 02:43 PM

I had my Nevermind phase, when I first started listening to Nirvana, but In Utero, in general, was always my favourite too.

Forward To Death · 06-23-2013, 03:01 PM

Nevermind just has a nice sound, but it's pop.

In Utero is kind of abrasive. It's still pop-sounding in many ways, but it's definitely not on the same level that Nevermind was. I think it's somewhere between Nevermind and Incesticide/Bleach.

djchameleon · 06-23-2013, 03:30 PM

Nevermind is the only thing that I would willingly listen to from Nirvana and I'm more inclined to listen to a larger variety of Foo Fighter songs back to back but as long as I cherry picked them from different albums.

Thinkofthechildren · 06-24-2013, 12:47 AM

Foo Fighters are absolutely terrible. Nirvana's quality was I'm guessing 80% Kurt. Grohl and the other guy just stunged around whilst Kurt wrote the songs.

sidewinder · 06-24-2013, 01:10 PM

Dave Grohl should stay behind the drum kit, or at least go back to it. The Foo Fighters' first two albums were pretty good, but after that there's something about their sound that I can't stand. I don't like his yelling and it just seems constant. STFU.

Nirvana on the other hand, were a great band.

Powerstars · 06-24-2013, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sidewinder

Dave Grohl should stay behind the drum kit, or at least go back to it. The Foo Fighters' first two albums were pretty good, but after that there's something about their sound that I can't stand. I don't like his yelling and it just seems constant. STFU.

Nirvana on the other hand, were a great band.

I don't know, I think he can both sing and scream well.

sidewinder · 06-24-2013, 02:51 PM

Perhaps, I just find him annoying.

View Poll Results: Foo Fighters or Nirvana?
Nirvana	106	66.25%
Tie	15	9.38%
Foo Fighters	39	24.38%
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll

06-23-2013, 01:16 PM	#11 (permalink)
Mojo Melancholia Eternally Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: England Posts: 5,018	Yeah, they were a decent band. I won't knock them or anything. It's just a case of the Yawnsvilles for me now and has been since my Nirvana phase in my teens. You never know, I may start to listen to them again one day. __________________ Last.FM \| Echoes and Dust

06-23-2013, 02:43 PM	#14 (permalink)
Mojo Melancholia Eternally Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: England Posts: 5,018	I had my Nevermind phase, when I first started listening to Nirvana, but In Utero, in general, was always my favourite too. __________________ Last.FM \| Echoes and Dust

06-24-2013, 01:10 PM	#18 (permalink)
sidewinder Engorged Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 5,536	Dave Grohl should stay behind the drum kit, or at least go back to it. The Foo Fighters' first two albums were pretty good, but after that there's something about their sound that I can't stand. I don't like his yelling and it just seems constant. STFU. Nirvana on the other hand, were a great band. __________________ last.fm \| my collection on RYM \| vinyl instagram @allthatyouseeandhear I'd love to see your signature/links too, but the huge and obnoxious ones have caused me to block all signatures.

06-24-2013, 02:51 PM	#20 (permalink)
sidewinder Engorged Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 5,536	Perhaps, I just find him annoying. __________________ last.fm \| my collection on RYM \| vinyl instagram @allthatyouseeandhear I'd love to see your signature/links too, but the huge and obnoxious ones have caused me to block all signatures.

06-23-2013, 02:43 PM	#13 (permalink)
Forward To Death Trolier Than Thou Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Minnesota Posts: 1,336	Nirvana. Not really even close for me, since I've never been interested in Foo Fighters. Nevermind is a damn good album, and In Utero is even better. Uhhh, that one album by Foo Fighters wasn't too bad I guess... Yeah, that one album.

06-23-2013, 03:01 PM	#15 (permalink)
Forward To Death Trolier Than Thou Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Minnesota Posts: 1,336	Nevermind just has a nice sound, but it's pop. In Utero is kind of abrasive. It's still pop-sounding in many ways, but it's definitely not on the same level that Nevermind was. I think it's somewhere between Nevermind and Incesticide/Bleach.

06-24-2013, 12:47 AM	#17 (permalink)
Thinkofthechildren Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 135	Foo Fighters are absolutely terrible. Nirvana's quality was I'm guessing 80% Kurt. Grohl and the other guy just stunged around whilst Kurt wrote the songs.