Nirvana vs. Foo Fighters - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Foo Fighters or Nirvana?
Nirvana 106 66.25%
Tie 15 9.38%
Foo Fighters 39 24.38%
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2014, 02:41 AM   #131 (permalink)
Trolier Than Thou
 
Forward To Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taxman View Post
I enjoy most of Nirvana's output and they are one of my favourite bands, but what I mean is that those Cobain HC lovers are annoying. When it comes to praising his persona instead of his music. Basically I think Kurt has been, and whole Nirvana have been, misunderstood by some people. But maybe I should not read YouTube comments. Dunno.
That kind of music isn't really meant to be completely understood. It's what you make of it.
Forward To Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2014, 11:44 PM   #132 (permalink)
watching the wheels
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 470
Default

How one can really completely understood music anyway, and what does understanding music mean? I don't know, but maybe it shouldn't have been tried at all.
__________________
...
Taxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2014, 01:33 AM   #133 (permalink)
Trolier Than Thou
 
Forward To Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,336
Default

You could stay that interpreting the lyrics in whatever way you see fit is understanding the music, and you could say that understanding what instruments are creating a sound is understanding the music. There's plenty to understand about music, and if you aren't understanding something about it, then maybe you're just wasting your time. You should at least know why you're listening to the music you listen to, right? I think part of that is understanding the music to some degree.
Forward To Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2014, 08:59 AM   #134 (permalink)
watching the wheels
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 470
Default

You can understand music in a technical way, if you know theory enough but you can also understand it in an other way. The most important thing in music is not on the notebook, mid you. Of course, everyone understands this side of music differently, which means that one particular song can have a different meaning to different people and they may be opposite to the composers'. Is that understanding? Maybe not. So I'd rather say, you can't understand, you can only interpret it, and everyone solves the code differently.

But surely you can understand music perfectly from the technical point of view, you can say "this chord is an A minor" and nobody can disagree with your conclusion. However, that is not the most important aspect...
, how can one misunderstand Nirvana's music then, like I wrote, I honestly do not know. Maybe I should have said that most of them interpret it differently than I. But you know, everyone feels the same but just sees it from a different point of view, so I really can't tell. Never mind.
__________________
...
Taxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2014, 09:00 AM   #135 (permalink)
watching the wheels
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 470
Default

And when it comes to why I listen to something, I don't know, it sounds good? That's not enough, I want some emotional response too, but what someone gets from something is kinda personal.
__________________
...
Taxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2014, 12:09 AM   #136 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1
Default Foo Fighters

Foo Fighters, all the way.

Nirvana just doesn't have the grip on me like the Foo Fighters do. However, I still find myself getting down to some old school Nirvana every once in awhile...
BurningDownTheVillager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 01:31 PM   #137 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Powerstars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 450
Default

I would totally be ready to support Foo Fighters in this (Been a while since I posted here), but there's one problem...I've listened to 2 of Nirvana's 3 studio albums, as well as their unplugged record. I've heard 1 of the Foo's studio albums and own their Greatest Hits. So I have to stick up for Nirvana here, but that's just because I don't have a good enough grasp on the Foo's. "Wasting Light" was amazing.
__________________
My New Journal
Favorite Album Of The Moment: They Might Be Giants - Glean
Powerstars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 02:02 PM   #138 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Vince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 25
Default

I can safely say in this thread that Dave Grohl plays for both teams
Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2014, 02:04 AM   #139 (permalink)
Groupie
 
MetalTeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 15
Default

I think both bands are good although I have never been a big fan of either.
But I think Nirvana has had a bigger influence and impact on music.
MetalTeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2014, 07:03 AM   #140 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Kip1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 94
Default

I like Foo Fighters more. I'm not a fan of Nirvana in the least, but I can understand and respect why he is held in such high regards.
Kip1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.