![]() |
Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd
I despise both of these bands, but I was wondering if anyone wanted to voice their opinion on who sux the worst.
|
nickleback sux way more
|
well i would put it as who is lamer...nickelback look a lot lamer then puddle of mud, but i would have to say nickelbacks song pissed me off way more then any puddle of mud song...i just didn't see anything special in puddle of mud, whilst nickelback really pissed me off
|
i think your both drunk, and before you pine away like hippy toolbags, **** your opinion. Are you ****ting me? You've opted for Puddle of Mud? At least Nickleback makes good songs. Theres a reason we've only heard 4 puddle of Mudd songs on any sort of mass level. Its because they fired the songwriter and then jacked all his stuff to make the first album. Then they hired professional songwriters to do the second disc so they wouldn't completly embarass themselves. Waste of money that was.
Puddle of Mudd was as middle of the road, suburban preteen BS as you could get. They did everything that everyone else did just so they could nestle safely in the post-grunge market. There is no redeeming quilty to this band, they didn't make one good song. Finding an audience because your first single says "I love the way you smack my ass" is the first sign that you suck. End of story. I can't believe that any one would option them out of these two. |
Quote:
|
i say ....none of them. i hate them both. i would pull off my ears and eat them before i was forced to listen to thier music.
|
They both suck so bad...If I had to chose it would be the ole Nickelback had to go though...
|
they both suck they make pod sound good well not really
|
I can't even choose, I don't listen to either so they both suck equally to me...or just don't catch my attention. See? I can't even decide that, I just don't listen to them. So..**** em.
|
Quote:
|
Nickelback...They suck donkey b@lls
|
Okie I'm going to risk what little music credibility I have, I actually like Puddle Of Mudd alot, shock horror. Hey don't frown at me, they are well kewl. So okie they sound a bit cheesy sometimes but some of their songs can be catchy as hell. And don't tell me you haven't sung along to 'How You Remind Me' by Nickelback ;) (though do agree with majority of comments, if I had to choose Nickelback would get the chop)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I`m not going to choose , it`s too pointless to even enter my head which of these total waste of spaces are worse.
In fact I only came in here to post a picture of Keith http://the-light.com/longhair/photos/keith.jpg |
yeah whos keith?
|
Who cares, its better than this topic...
|
Quote:
|
His face isn't symmetrical..
|
Looks to me like someone smacked him in the face with a frying pan 5 seconds before the pic was taken
|
Haha it does aswel... I like how his eyes are looking in seperate directions...
|
Neither I Love Them Both Equally
|
I like some Puddle of Mudd 'Away From Me' and 'Blurry' but Nickelback is just boring.
|
Quote:
|
I watched a thing on tv a few months back about how much of a struggle it was for nickleback to make it big. When they finally got their contract they gave into what the record company wanted from them. I dont know if you've actually listened to their songs but all the radio ones are all about love, about the same parts of love too, like losing a loved one for example. They just have slightly different muisc with each of their songs to make them seem like a completely different song.
Kinda makes me feel they should have just layed low to start with. I dont know if the same sort of story applies to PoM but i presume it would. Anywaaaaaaay, i think they're both a load of rubbish, along with POD and all that sort of stuff |
What "thing" was this. I don't want to come off as a Nickleback advocate but they have better songs than POM. ANd their first CD (major label) wasn't exactly radio friendly (like the second one was).
|
Its all crap! I like SYSTEM OF A DOWN. just thought i'd add that
|
They are both s h i t!!
Nickellback are worse though!! YUK |
Quote:
|
i think Puddle of Mudd sucks more....i don`t know why...but somehow the lead singer reminds me of Ugly Kid Joe....and Kid really sucks ass!!!
say you don`t need no diamond rings...and i`ll be satified... |
Quote:
|
Well I think both of those bands are kind of s*** but it doesn't really matter. There are still people who actually like those bands and I respect their decision to listen to crap music. Nah im just joking but I still think those arent the best bands in the wolrd.
|
puddle of mudd rule sometimes but sometimes they suk
|
May both bands suck the c**k of Satan for all eternity!!!
They both are pure turd :finger: Respect to those that like them mind you...but i just dont rate em ...and another thing...are they still going??? |
I saw Nickelback (I took my sister for her b-day) and it was something she really really wanted..so I went, got ripped, sat back and watched her have a really good time...the music wasnt as bad as some and I did find myself singing along to "you remind me of what I" and I dont own anything by either band..though I did strip to the one Puddle of Mudd song "control"..they both suck..but Puddle of Mudd did feature some drummage by Josh Freese...
|
I'm really glad you brought this thread out from the crypt, because as I was advocating; look which band is still kicking. To quote Rolling Stone:
"[Nickle Back] was one of the only non-emo rock bands that sold anything in 06" And puddle of mud is a painful memory. I'm sure you'll complain that NB is a persistant painful memory but since I beat you to your own crappy one-liner you're going to need to come up with something else. I don't think anyone is saying (and im certainly not) that their the next beatles, but honestly I'd rather listen to "Rock Star" than most of the other crap that makes pop radio, but I concede that "I love you" or whatever its called is aimed at making cash and women. |
Nickelback's demographics are what makes them money...
Not their talent. |
haha.
What are people's issues with Nickleback? Nickleback are, COMMERCIALLY speaking, a good band! They write catchy melodies and hooks that are radio-friendly. They churn out hit after hit. Now, don't get me wrong - sure, their music may be derivative, unoriginal, redundant, clichéd, even ridiculous, but your casual music listener likes it! They write for the mainstream masses, and among those bands who are attempting to do this and have this in mind when writing, Nickleback are pretty much the best of the lot! Commercial rock ain't art, folks. The purpose is to design a product and make as much money out of it as possible. It's a craft. And these Canadians are skilled craftsmen...if (obviously) not particularly musically talented or virtuosic. On the side...it pisses me off when I see critics review Nickleback as if they're supposed to be anything besides derivative, and give their albums 2 stars for that reason. And then, they give Shakira's latest works 90/100. Shakira's music is among the most derivative, clichéd garbage I've ever heard. What happened to consistency, I wonder... |
Quote:
|
Nickelback would be better if they hadn't been releasing the same song over and over again for about five years now.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.